Gladstone Land LAND Business Segments
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acre-feet of Water Assets by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Colorado | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Delaware | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Florida | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Fresno, CA | 28.7K+0.8% | 28.5K+0.5% | 28.3K+6.6% | 26.6K+5.3% | 25.3K+18.6% | |
| Georgia | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Kern, CA | 193.2K0.0% | 193.2K0.0% | 193.2K0.0% | 193.2K0.0% | 193.2K+1.2% | |
| Maryland | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Michigan | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Nebraska | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| New Jersey | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Oregon | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| South Carolina | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Texas | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Washington | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Net Cost Basis by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | $193.83M-0.7% | $195.27M-0.8% | $196.88M-0.9% | $198.69M-1.0% | $200.69M-1.1% | |
| Colorado | $166.8M-4.3% | $174.28M-4.1% | $181.78M-0.2% | $182.14M-0.2% | $182.5M-0.2% | |
| Delaware | $5.07M-0.3% | $5.09M-0.3% | $5.1M-0.3% | $5.12M-0.2% | $5.13M-0.3% | |
| Florida | $466.49M-3.6% | $483.91M-10.0% | $537.42M-9.0% | $590.37M-6.0% | $628.38M-5.7% | |
| Georgia | $9.04M-1.2% | $9.16M+0.3% | $9.13M+0.3% | $9.11M-2.7% | $9.36M-2.7% | |
| Maryland | $31.45M-0.3% | $31.55M-0.3% | $31.66M-0.3% | $31.76M-0.2% | $31.83M-0.3% | |
| Michigan | $58.82M-1.1% | $59.5M-0.9% | $60.03M-8.4% | $65.51M-10.5% | $73.18M-9.6% | |
| Nebraska | $79.01M-0.1% | $79.09M-11.4% | $89.24M-10.3% | $99.54M-9.5% | $109.99M-8.8% | |
| New Jersey | $8.12M-0.4% | $8.15M-0.4% | $8.19M-0.2% | $8.21M-0.3% | $8.23M-0.5% | |
| Oregon | $116.69M-0.1% | $116.79M+0.2% | $116.6M+0.1% | $116.47M+0.1% | $116.33M-0.4% | |
| South Carolina | $13.49M-0.7% | $13.58M-0.7% | $13.67M-0.7% | $13.76M-0.6% | $13.85M-0.6% | |
| Texas | $36.98M+0.8% | $36.68M+3.7% | $35.37M+3.9% | $34.03M+2.7% | $33.12M+2.8% | |
| Washington | $208.14M-2.3% | $213M-2.3% | $218.01M-2.2% | $222.96M-1.5% | $226.42M-1.6% | |
| Total Acres by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | |
| Colorado | $128.44K-1.0% | $129.77K-1.0% | $131.09K0.0% | $131.09K0.0% | $131.09K0.0% | |
| Delaware | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | |
| Florida | $44.33K-5.7% | $47K-15.0% | $55.31K-13.1% | $63.62K-8.1% | $69.25K+15.6% | |
| Georgia | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | |
| Maryland | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | |
| Michigan | $4.98K0.0% | $4.98K0.0% | $4.98K-11.5% | $5.63K-10.3% | $6.27K-9.3% | |
| Nebraska | $20.89K0.0% | $20.89K-10.9% | $23.45K-9.8% | $26.01K-9.0% | $28.57K-8.2% | |
| New Jersey | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | |
| Oregon | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | |
| South Carolina | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | |
| Texas | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | |
| Washington | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K0.0% | |
| Farm acres by Geography | ||||||
| Kern, CA | 9.6K0.0% | 9.6K— | —— | —— | —— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Gladstone Land break its business down?
- Gladstone Land (LAND) reports acre-feet of water assets by geography across 15 parts — Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Florida and Fresno, CA. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Gladstone Land's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Gladstone Land's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
