Laser Photonics Corporation LASE Ratios & Valuation
| FY'25 | FY'24 | FY'23 | FY'22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | |||||
| Operating margin | -159.3%+29.9pp | -189.3%-123pp | -66.4%-13.5pp | -53%— | |
| Net margin | -209.3%— | —— | -73.7%-20.0pp | -53.8%-69.1pp | |
| EBITDA margin | -146%+14.8pp | -160.8%-121pp | -39.4%+13.5pp | -53%-82.7pp | |
| Returns | |||||
| Return on assets | -131.2%— | —— | -19.7%-3.2pp | -16.5%-25.4pp | |
| Efficiency | |||||
| Asset turnover | 0.6×+0.4× | 0.2×-0.1× | 0.3×0.0× | 0.3×-0.3× | |
| Inventory turnover | 3×+1.9× | 1.1×+0.5× | 0.7×-0.7× | 1.3×+0.4× | |
| Liquidity | |||||
| Current ratio | 0.3×-1.5× | 1.8×-7.2× | 9×-5.2× | 14.2×+7.9× | |
| Quick ratio | 0.1×-0.5× | 0.6×-6.2× | 6.8×-6.3× | 13.1×+11.4× | |
| Cash ratio | 0.1×-0.1× | 0.2×-5.8× | 6×-6.6× | 12.6×+11.1× | |
| Leverage | |||||
| Debt-to-assets | 0.5×+0.2× | 0.3×+0.3× | 0×0.0× | 0×0.0× | |
| Per Share | |||||
| Book value per share | -$0.29-134% | $0.88-43.7% | $1.56-48.7% | $3.04+171% | |
| Valuation | |||||
| Market capitalization | $63.23M+60.6% | $79.81M+650% | $10.65M-33.8% | $16.07M— | |
| Enterprise value | $65.92M+48.1% | $84.29M+1,572% | $5.04M+6.8% | $4.72M— | |
| Price / sales | 9.1×+3.4× | 23.4×+21.0× | 2.4×-1.8× | 4.1×— | |
| EV / sales | 8.1×+2.6× | 24.7×+23.6× | 1.1×-0.1× | 1.2×— | |
| Earnings yield | -34.9%— | —— | -31.2%-18.1pp | -13%— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What are Laser Photonics Corporation's profit margins?
- Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE) runs a 68.9% gross margin and a -208.0% operating margin, with a -268.7% net margin.
- Where do Laser Photonics Corporation's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Laser Photonics Corporation's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
