Skip to content

Match Group MTCH Debt-to-assets

Debt-to-assets at other companies

Meta Platforms, Inc. logo
Meta Platforms, Inc.META
0.2×0.0×

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$863.9M+3.9%
Gross profit$653.3M+9.9%
Operating income$236.4M+37.0%
Net income$166.8M+41.9%
EPS (diluted)$0.68+54.5%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.0B+149%
Total debt$4.0B+16.0%
Total equity-$218.1M-19.4%
Total assets$4.4B+13.3%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$194.4M+0.6%
CapEx$20.4M+32.1%
Free cash flow$174.0M-2.1%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$8.27B-8.6%
Enterprise value$11.22B-6.8%
P/E12.5×-4.1×
P/S2.4×-0.3×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin73.8%+2.0pp
Operating margin26.6%+3.1pp
Net margin18.8%+3.0pp
FCF margin29%+6.0pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity6%
Debt / equity1.5×
Current ratio1.6×-0.1×

Where this comes from

Calculated from Match Group’s reported figures.

Based on the most recent quarter.

The official record: Match Group’s 10-Q, filed May 6, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Match Group's debt-to-assets.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Match Group's debt-to-assets?
Match Group (MTCH) reported debt-to-assets of 0.9× in Q1 2026.
How has Match Group's debt-to-assets changed year-over-year?
Match Group's debt-to-assets increased by 2.3% year-over-year, from 0.9× to 0.9×.
What is the long-term trend for Match Group's debt-to-assets?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Match Group's debt-to-assets has grown at a -6.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 1.3× to 0.9×.
What does debt-to-assets mean?
What fraction of everything the company owns is funded by debt.
How do you interpret debt-to-assets?
A lower ratio indicates a more conservatively financed balance sheet. Rising debt-to-assets over time signals increasing financial risk.
How does debt-to-assets compare across companies?
Comparable within an industry; bounded between 0 and 1 for most non-financials, which makes cross-company reads cleaner than debt-to-equity.