Skip to content

N-able NABL Deferred consideration expense

Deferred consideration expense at other companies

Priority Technology Holdings logo
Priority Technology HoldingsPRTH
$673K-5.2%
Driven Brands Holdings Inc. logo
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.DRVN
$919K-42.4%
Ceco Environmental logo
Ceco EnvironmentalCECO
$0-100%
Cardinal Infrastructure Group, Inc.
 logo
Cardinal Infrastructure Group, Inc. CDNL
$3.77M
Digital Turbine logo
Digital TurbineAPPS
$106K
LegalZoom.com, Inc. logo
LegalZoom.com, Inc.LZ
$3.18M

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$133.7M+13.1%
Gross profit$101.9M+12.6%
Operating income$12.5M+583%
Net income-$615.0K+91.4%
EPS (diluted)$0.00+100%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$117.8M+25.2%
Total debt$435.7M+17.7%
Total equity$798.8M+3.1%
Total assets$1.4B+3.2%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$17.5M-11.2%
CapEx$1.7M-48.7%
Free cash flow$15.8M-3.7%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$600.93M-57.7%
Enterprise value$918.78M-45.8%
P/S1.1×-1.9×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin77%-3.9pp
Operating margin9%-4.5pp
Net margin-2%-5.5pp
FCF margin14.1%-2.3pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-1.3%-3.5pp
Debt / equity0.5×+0.1×
Current ratio1.3×+0.1×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by N-able in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept nabl:DeferredConsiderationExpense.

The official record: N-able’s 10-Q, filed May 7, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about N-able's deferred consideration expense.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is N-able's deferred consideration expense?
N-able (NABL) reported deferred consideration expense of $1.64M in Q1 2026.
How has N-able's deferred consideration expense changed year-over-year?
N-able's deferred consideration expense decreased by 55.5% year-over-year, from $3.69M to $1.64M.
What does deferred consideration expense mean?
Captures the non-cash expense recognized over time related to deferred payment obligations from business acquisitions. This reflects the financing cost associated with structured acquisition deals rather than core operational performance.