Skip to content

OS Therapies OSTX Chief Operating Decision Maker — Operating Income

Similar metrics at other companies

Flexible Solutions International logo
FSIOperating Income
-$85.97K+49.8%
Sono-Tek Corporation logo
SOTKOperating — Operating Income
$601K+109%
CO2 Energy Transition Corp. Common Stock logo
NOEMOperating Income
-$196.73K-15.2%
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.
 logo
EMATOperating Income
-$15.66M-459%
CHE
CHECOperating Income
-$176.76K
KEE
KEELOperating Income
-$98.39M-182%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Operating income-$10.2M-103%
Net income-$10.4M-168%
EPS (diluted)-$0.27-50.0%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$917.6K-69.1%
Total debt$20.0M
Total equity-$10.8M-159%
Total assets$7.3M+71.7%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$4.6M-32.6%
CapEx$316.4K
Free cash flow-$3.7M

Valuation

See full
Market cap$84.62M+66.4%
Enterprise value$103.7M

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity470%
Debt / equity-1.8×
Current ratio0.1×-1.1×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by OS Therapies in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss.

The official record: OS Therapies’s 10-Q, filed May 18, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about OS Therapies's chief operating decision maker — operating income.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is OS Therapies's chief operating decision maker — operating income?
OS Therapies (OSTX) reported chief operating decision maker — operating income of -$10.17M in Q1 2026.
How has OS Therapies's chief operating decision maker — operating income changed year-over-year?
OS Therapies's chief operating decision maker — operating income decreased by 103.4% year-over-year, from -$5M to -$10.17M.
What does chief operating decision maker — operating income mean?
Measures the profitability or loss generated by the core business segment before accounting for non-operating items, interest, and taxes. It serves as a key indicator of the operational viability of the company's clinical-stage development activities. A negative value is common for early-stage biopharmaceutical firms heavily investing in R&D.