Skip to content

PJT Partners PJT Return on assets

Return on assets at other companies

Goldman Sachs Group logo
Goldman Sachs GroupGS
0.9%+0.1pp
Houlihan Lokey logo
Houlihan LokeyHLI
10.5%-1.0pp
Lazard logo
LazardLAZ
6.5%-0.4pp
Evercore logo
EvercoreEVR
19.7%+5.7pp
Moelis & Company logo
Moelis & CompanyMC
19.9%+3.0pp
Piper Sandler logo
Piper SandlerPIPR
14.3%+3.1pp

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$418.2M+28.9%
Net income$60.5M+12.0%
EPS (diluted)$2.21+11.1%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$308.8M+58.9%
Total debt$421.5M+2.7%
Total equity$272.7M+83.3%
Total assets$1.6B+12.0%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$64.3M+185%
CapEx$8.3M+317%
Free cash flow$56.0M+172%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$4.01B+5.1%

Profitability

See full
Net margin10.3%-0.1pp
FCF margin34%+1.1pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity88.5%-7.8pp
Debt / equity1.5×-1.2×

Where this comes from

Calculated from PJT Partners’s reported figures.

Based on trailing twelve months.

The official record: PJT Partners’s 10-Q, filed April 30, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about PJT Partners's return on assets.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is PJT Partners's return on assets?
PJT Partners (PJT) reported return on assets of 12.6% in Q1 2026.
How has PJT Partners's return on assets changed year-over-year?
PJT Partners's return on assets increased by 9.2% year-over-year, from 11.5% to 12.6%.
What is the long-term trend for PJT Partners's return on assets?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), PJT Partners's return on assets has grown at a -1.3% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from 11.1% to 10.4%.
What does return on assets mean?
Trailing-twelve-month net income divided by average total assets. Measures how efficiently the asset base generates profit, independent of how those assets are financed. Computed as net income over average total assets — note this is OpenCapital's standard definition and may differ from data vendors that use alternative numerators.