Skip to content

Public Storage PSA Palm Springs — Accumulated Depreciation

Other geography segments

Los Angeles
$1.13B+6.5%
New York
$687.48M+8.1%
San Francisco
$660.44M+5.3%
Houston
$534.99M+12.2%
Seattle/Tacoma
$529.84M+8.4%
Chicago
$505.45M+6.1%
Miami
$497.03M+6.7%
Atlanta
$381.48M+7.3%
Orlando/Daytona
$278.48M+13.9%
Denver
$243.88M+9.3%
Baltimore
$240.59M+18.4%
Philadelphia
$238.24M+8.5%
Tampa
$218.14M+12.1%
West Palm Beach
$210.12M+8.5%
Charlotte
$207.71M+9.0%
Phoenix
$195.3M+11.2%
Detroit
$189.27M+10.2%
Portland
$165.51M+9.1%
Boston
$161.04M+8.2%
San Diego
$143.3M+8.2%
Austin
$143.28M+8.9%
Raleigh
$120.8M+12.4%
San Antonio
$120.78M+12.4%
Sacramento
$108.4M+6.0%
Norfolk
$104.35M+7.2%
Honolulu
$99.43M+8.1%
Kansas City
$87.05M+5.8%
Indianapolis
$84.75M+13.2%
Oklahoma City
$82.26M+24.9%
Las Vegas
$79.84M+11.3%
Columbus
$77.08M+11.6%
Columbia
$71.9M+15.5%
Nashville/Bowling Green
$53.97M+15.9%
Cincinnati
$50.83M+10.6%
Memphis
$45.75M+22.6%
Colorado Springs
$45.57M+8.3%
Jacksonville
$45.45M+5.6%
Fort Myers/Naples
$45.15M+19.0%
Charleston
$45.01M+11.2%
New Orleans
$42.84M+10.7%
Milwaukee
$42.08M+5.5%
Hartford/New Haven
$40.71M+4.4%
Greensboro
$39.59M+8.8%
Greensville/Spartanburg/Asheville
$36.7M+14.1%
Birmingham
$35.89M+7.1%
Richmond
$33.81M+10.0%
Mobile
$32.11M+26.8%
Savannah
$31.65M+13.2%
Louisville
$29.75M+11.2%
Monterey/Salinas
$29.3M+5.1%
Tucson
$28.26M+6.5%
Chattanooga
$26.71M+11.4%
Salt Lake City
$23.05M+10.6%
Omaha
$20.67M+20.4%
Cleveland/Akron
$20.39M+12.2%
Buffalo/Rochester
$20.35M+8.3%
Reno
$18.19M+8.3%
Boise
$15.28M+50.3%
Augusta
$14.92M+16.3%
Wichita
$14.39M+6.7%
Providence
$11.2M+14.3%
Dayton
$9.92M+9.4%
Huntsville/Decatur
$9.33M+10.1%
Santa Barbara
$8.24M+6.8%
Fort Wayne
$8.2M+8.8%
Roanoke
$7.96M+20.6%
Evansville
$7.62M+11.6%
Rochester
$6.24M+14.0%
Shreveport
$5.83M+4.4%
Lansing
$5.79M+33.1%
Springfield/Holyoke
$5.69M+3.3%
Flint
$4.47M+28.1%
Topeka
$3.59M+4.8%
Syracuse
$2.44M+6.1%
Joplin
$1.91M+5.7%
Modesto/Fresno/Stockton
$1.37M+8.0%

Similar metrics at other companies

Ladder Capital logo
LADRPalmview Texas — Real Estate And Accumulated Depreciation Carrying Amount Of Buildings And Improvements
$4.84M0.0%
Extra Space Storage logo
EXRPA — Accumulated Depreciation
$69.48M+21.0%
Ladder Capital logo
LADRPalmview Texas — Real Estate And Accumulated Depreciation Carrying Amount Of Land
$938K0.0%
Cabot Corporation logo
CBTAccumulated Depreciation
$2.76B+8.3%
Travel + Leisure logo
TNLAccumulated Depreciation
$1.12B+2.5%
HES
HESMAccumulated Depreciation
$2.06B

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$1.2B+2.9%
Operating income$474.3M+2.2%
Net income$526.3M+29.1%
EPS (diluted)$2.71+32.8%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$134.6M-53.1%
Total debt$10.3B+9.6%
Total equity$9.2B-3.6%
Total assets$19.9B+1.2%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$694.8M-1.5%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$55.89B+14.3%
P/E29.4×+2.4×
P/S11.5×+1.2×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin72%
Operating margin51.6%
Net margin39.2%-2.6pp
FCF margin64.3%

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity20.3%+0.1pp
Debt / equity1.1×+0.1×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Public Storage in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:RealEstateAccumulatedDepreciation.

The official record: Public Storage’s 10-K, filed February 12, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Public Storage's palm springs — accumulated depreciation.

Connect your AI assistant and compare segments, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Public Storage's palm springs — accumulated depreciation?
Public Storage (PSA) reported palm springs — accumulated depreciation of $16.5M in Q4 2025.
How has Public Storage's palm springs — accumulated depreciation changed year-over-year?
Public Storage's palm springs — accumulated depreciation increased by 7.5% year-over-year, from $15.35M to $16.5M.
What does palm springs — accumulated depreciation mean?
The total amount of depreciation taken against the building assets in the Palm Springs market since their acquisition or construction. This reduces the net book value of the properties over time.