Prospect Capital PSEC Business Segments
| TTM Q3 '26 | TTM Q2 '26 | TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair Value by Geography | ||||||
| California | $3.24B+0.8% | $3.24B-1.2% | $3.21B-3.0% | $3.17B— | $3.22B— | |
| Mississippi | $3.45B— | $3.21B— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Investment , cost by Geography | ||||||
| California | $4.44B+10.3% | $4.37B+11.2% | $4.25B+8.8% | $4.14B— | $4.02B— | |
| Mississippi | $1.93B— | $1.91B— | —— | —— | —— | |
| % of Portfolio by Geography | ||||||
| Mississippi | 16.2%— | —— | —— | —— | —— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Prospect Capital break its business down?
- Prospect Capital (PSEC) reports fair value by geography across 2 parts — California and Mississippi. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Prospect Capital's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Prospect Capital's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.