SSR Mining SSRM Business Segments
| FY'25 | FY'24 | FY'23 | FY'22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $450.44M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $540.56M+32.2% | $409.03M-24.0% | $538.24M— | —— | |
| Puna | $459.5M+39.0% | $330.53M+17.2% | $281.92M— | —— | |
| Seabee | $179.14M-6.6% | $191.77M+16.7% | $164.35M— | —— | |
| Other Operating Income by Business | |||||
| Marigold | -$1.96M+27.8% | -$2.71M— | $0— | $0— | |
| Puna | -$992K+53.2% | -$2.12M— | $0— | $0— | |
| Seabee | -$177K+71.5% | -$621K-22.2% | -$508K— | $0— | |
| Total Assets by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $2.28B— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $3.27B— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Puna | $1.46B— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Seabee | $1.45B— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Other income (expense) by Business | |||||
| CC&V | -$11K— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | -$958K-4.6% | -$916K-184% | $1.09M+137% | -$2.98M— | |
| Puna | $16.13M+254% | $4.55M-87.2% | $35.63M+189% | $12.33M— | |
| Seabee | -$21K+83.1% | -$124K+15.1% | -$146K-32.7% | -$110K— | |
| Operating Income (Loss) by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $267.31M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $243.72M+122% | $109.96M-41.5% | $187.89M— | —— | |
| Puna | $250.78M+116% | $116.34M+61.9% | $71.85M— | —— | |
| Seabee | $44.58M+20.6% | $36.97M+238% | -$26.87M— | —— | |
| Income (loss) before income and mining taxes by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $267.62M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $246.45M+113% | $115.79M-38.7% | $188.97M+116% | $87.34M— | |
| Puna | $249.53M+109% | $119.5M+74.4% | $68.51M+1,104% | $5.69M— | |
| Seabee | $45.88M+11.3% | $41.2M+299% | -$20.68M-119% | $107.99M— | |
| Interest Income by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $320K— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $3.72M-45.0% | $6.76M— | $0— | $0— | |
| Puna | $2.76M+183% | $977K-85.7% | $6.83M+51.1% | $4.52M— | |
| Seabee | $1.26M-72.4% | $4.56M-35.2% | $7.04M+152% | $2.79M— | |
| Interest Expense by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $0— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | -$26K— | $0— | $0— | —— | |
| Puna | -$1.21M+10.0% | -$1.34M-66.5% | -$807K— | —— | |
| Seabee | $0— | $0— | $0— | —— | |
| Cost of Sales by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $157.4M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $251.83M+3.1% | $244.31M-15.5% | $289.06M— | —— | |
| Puna | $161.75M+3.9% | $155.66M-4.8% | $163.56M— | —— | |
| Seabee | $82.33M+5.8% | $77.85M-6.1% | $82.9M— | —— | |
| General and administrative expense by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $0— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $0— | $0— | $0-100% | $1K— | |
| Puna | $0— | $0-100% | $247K-3.9% | $257K— | |
| Seabee | $0— | $0— | $0-100% | $11K— | |
| Foreign exchange gain (loss) by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $0— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $0+100% | -$8K— | $0-100% | $1K— | |
| Puna | -$19.96M-1,852% | -$1.02M+97.7% | -$44.98M-1.6% | -$44.29M— | |
| Seabee | $56K+127% | -$208K+70.7% | -$709K+38.0% | -$1.14M— | |
| Impairment charges of goodwill by Business | |||||
| Çöpler | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | |
| Puna | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | |
| Seabee | $0— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| CapEx by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $41.46M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $62.89M+61.0% | $39.07M-52.5% | $82.25M+39.9% | $58.8M+5.3% | |
| Puna | $13.9M-17.3% | $16.79M+27.3% | $13.19M+26.3% | $10.45M-0.1% | |
| Seabee | $36.1M+6.7% | $33.83M-9.8% | $37.52M-1.8% | $38.19M-5.8% | |
| Depreciation, depletion, and amortization by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $11.56M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $36.18M+0.4% | $36.05M-22.0% | $46.24M+35.0% | $34.26M-3.3% | |
| Puna | $32.33M-2.1% | $33.01M-1.3% | $33.44M+58.3% | $21.12M-4.0% | |
| Seabee | $35.63M-25.8% | $48.01M+18.4% | $40.53M-18.0% | $49.45M+9.1% | |
| Exploration and evaluation by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $377K— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $3.56M-72.8% | $13.1M-26.3% | $17.77M+11.7% | $15.91M— | |
| Puna | $8.54M+51.5% | $5.64M-22.5% | $7.27M+35.1% | $5.38M— | |
| Seabee | $14.07M-6.3% | $15.01M-8.0% | $16.32M+22.6% | $13.31M— | |
| Reclamation and remediation costs by Business | |||||
| CC&V | $13.21M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $3.31M+14.2% | $2.9M+4.8% | $2.76M+21.5% | $2.27M— | |
| Puna | $5.12M-71.2% | $17.76M+480% | $3.06M+77.4% | $1.73M— | |
| Seabee | $1.34M+0.6% | $1.34M+14.8% | $1.16M+47.2% | $791K— | |
| Revenue by Product | |||||
| Gold | $1.16B+76.6% | $656.96M-42.4% | $1.14B+20.6% | $946.01M-23.8% | |
| Lead | $44.13M-3.9% | $45.93M-1.1% | $46.42M+23.7% | $37.52M+13.5% | |
| Other | $36.38M+118% | $16.71M+9.8% | $15.21M— | —— | |
| Silver | $384.44M+41.2% | $272.33M+26.4% | $215.39M+40.5% | $153.28M-16.4% | |
| Zinc | $4.54M+23.3% | $3.68M-57.4% | $8.63M-22.0% | $11.06M-18.1% | |
| Average price per ounce/pound (in dollars per ounce/pound) by Product | |||||
| Lead | $3.58-5.5% | $3.79-0.8% | $3.82-0.3% | $3.83— | |
| Silver | $154.31+38.6% | $111.37+20.7% | $92.26+4.2% | $88.54— | |
| Zinc | $5.1+0.2% | $5.09+7.6% | $4.73-23.1% | $6.15— | |
| Notional ounce/pound by Product | |||||
| Zinc | $2.4M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Income (loss) before income and mining taxes by Geography | |||||
| Argentina | $201.14M+198% | $67.39M+391% | $13.73M+416% | $2.66M-96.6% | |
| Canada | -$6.26M-111% | $56.06M+173% | -$76.41M-250% | -$21.83M-182% | |
| Türkiye | -$233.02M+57.5% | -$548.08M-71.4% | -$319.78M-395% | $108.37M-42.0% | |
| United States | $481.52M+354% | $105.99M-41.7% | $181.93M+140% | $75.76M-45.2% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does SSR Mining break its business down?
- SSR Mining (SSRM) reports revenue by business across 4 parts — CC&V, Marigold, Puna and Seabee. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does SSR Mining's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in SSR Mining's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
