SSR Mining SSRM Business Segments
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $602.02M— | $450.44M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $611.02M+35.9% | $540.56M+32.2% | $518.22M+23.1% | $507.43M+10.4% | $449.52M-13.0% | |
| Puna | $550.48M+47.6% | $459.5M+39.0% | $414.13M+33.9% | $386.52M+34.6% | $372.94M+46.9% | |
| Seabee | $131.28M-37.2% | $179.14M-6.6% | $211.74M+12.6% | $208.1M+5.8% | $208.94M+9.2% | |
| Other Operating Income by Business | ||||||
| Marigold | -$4.46M-46.0% | -$1.96M+27.8% | -$3.19M-254% | -$2.91M-546% | -$3.05M— | |
| Puna | -$980K+58.4% | -$992K+53.2% | -$2.12M-200% | -$1.85M-163% | -$2.35M— | |
| Seabee | -$576K+7.2% | -$177K+71.5% | -$767K-477% | -$713K-174% | -$621K-63.0% | |
| Total Assets by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $2.52B— | $2.28B— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $3.39B+2.5% | $3.27B— | $3.37B— | $3.33B— | $3.31B— | |
| Puna | $1.58B+26.4% | $1.46B— | $1.41B— | $1.33B— | $1.25B— | |
| Seabee | $1.45B-5.7% | $1.45B— | $1.47B— | $1.48B— | $1.53B— | |
| Other income (expense) by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $376K— | -$11K— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | -$948K-45.8% | -$958K-4.6% | -$840K-93.8% | -$877K-2,049% | -$650K-294% | |
| Puna | $17.24M+53.6% | $16.13M+254% | $15.03M+39.0% | $12.85M-25.7% | $11.22M-53.0% | |
| Seabee | -$35K+71.8% | -$21K+83.1% | -$113K-78.0% | -$140K-94.4% | -$124K-5.5% | |
| Operating Income (Loss) by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $374.06M— | $267.31M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $297.85M+109% | $243.72M+122% | $208.56M+81.5% | $183M+28.3% | $142.51M-17.1% | |
| Puna | $329.41M+124% | $250.78M+116% | $189.8M+67.9% | $162.45M+79.9% | $147.36M+129% | |
| Seabee | $7.1M-87.4% | $44.58M+20.6% | $68.11M+621% | $58.41M+3,528% | $56.56M+914% | |
| Income (loss) before income and mining taxes by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $374.89M— | $267.62M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $299.2M+102% | $246.45M+113% | $212.55M+94.2% | $187.62M+51.7% | $148.31M-6.4% | |
| Puna | $338.62M+124% | $249.53M+109% | $181.95M+65.5% | $159.98M+83.3% | $150.94M+143% | |
| Seabee | $8.34M-86.0% | $45.88M+11.3% | $69.13M+655% | $60.87M+425% | $59.45M+3,315% | |
| Interest Income by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $460K— | $320K— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $2.32M-64.1% | $3.72M-45.0% | $4.84M-4.9% | $5.5M+52.4% | $6.46M+241% | |
| Puna | $2.74M+222% | $2.76M+183% | $1.82M-22.9% | $1.66M-58.4% | $852K-84.8% | |
| Seabee | $1.04M-68.9% | $1.26M-72.4% | $1.36M-77.2% | $2.23M-66.0% | $3.33M-52.0% | |
| Interest Expense by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | -$8K— | $0— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | -$26K— | -$26K— | $0— | $0— | $0— | |
| Puna | -$1.1M-7.6% | -$1.21M+10.0% | -$2.09M-232% | -$1.9M-129% | -$1.02M+1.0% | |
| Seabee | -$12K— | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | |
| Cost of Sales by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $194.18M— | $157.4M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $264.74M+4.2% | $251.83M+3.1% | $259.44M+3.2% | $271.11M+4.7% | $253.97M-10.4% | |
| Puna | $172.42M+4.8% | $161.75M+3.9% | $162.43M+6.4% | $162.53M+7.4% | $164.5M+13.7% | |
| Seabee | $80.44M+5.1% | $82.33M+5.8% | $83M+7.0% | $77.74M-6.4% | $76.54M-8.9% | |
| General and administrative expense by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $0— | $0— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | |
| Puna | $0— | $0— | $0-100% | $0-100% | $0-100% | |
| Seabee | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | $0— | |
| Foreign exchange gain (loss) by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $0— | $0— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $0+100% | $0+100% | $0+100% | $0+100% | -$8K— | |
| Puna | -$10.7M-43.3% | -$19.96M-1,852% | -$22.61M-135% | -$15.08M+17.8% | -$7.47M+75.9% | |
| Seabee | $248K+179% | $56K+127% | -$225K-74.1% | $359K+306% | -$313K+41.4% | |
| CapEx by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $47.55M— | $41.46M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $73.31M+41.3% | $62.89M+61.0% | $59.96M+85.6% | $57.63M+67.0% | $51.89M-5.8% | |
| Puna | $16.69M+8.4% | $13.9M-17.3% | $14.04M-7.2% | $15.86M+1.5% | $15.39M+10.1% | |
| Seabee | $42.11M+41.0% | $36.1M+6.7% | $35.03M+1.0% | $31.5M-21.1% | $29.86M-33.4% | |
| Depreciation, depletion, and amortization by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $16.43M— | $11.56M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $37.47M+0.4% | $36.18M+0.4% | $38.23M+0.6% | $39.8M-2.6% | $37.32M-17.2% | |
| Puna | $32.26M-7.5% | $32.33M-2.1% | $34.53M-3.1% | $35.27M+3.6% | $34.87M+7.4% | |
| Seabee | $29.06M-37.2% | $35.63M-25.8% | $42.91M-7.8% | $43.74M-8.6% | $46.3M-1.0% | |
| Exploration and evaluation by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $205K— | $377K— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $3.11M-67.9% | $3.56M-72.8% | $5.67M-74.0% | $7.55M-61.6% | $9.69M-48.4% | |
| Puna | $10.29M+81.2% | $8.54M+51.5% | $6.25M+58.3% | $5.82M+19.0% | $5.68M-13.1% | |
| Seabee | $11.74M-24.8% | $14.07M-6.3% | $12.61M-18.3% | $13.16M-17.3% | $15.6M-2.5% | |
| Reclamation and remediation costs by Business | ||||||
| CC&V | $15.92M— | $13.21M— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Marigold | $3.39M+13.8% | $3.31M+14.2% | $3.14M+9.7% | $3.06M+8.1% | $2.98M+6.5% | |
| Puna | $5.12M-71.8% | $5.12M-71.2% | $19.01M+467% | $18.6M+471% | $18.18M+476% | |
| Seabee | $1.34M+0.4% | $1.34M+0.6% | $1.34M+3.9% | $1.34M+7.2% | $1.34M+10.9% | |
| Revenue by Product | ||||||
| Gold | $1.33B+90.0% | $1.16B+76.6% | $1.01B+28.0% | $907.59M-3.1% | $701.05M-35.4% | |
| Lead | $42.71M-12.0% | $44.13M-3.9% | $47.72M+3.0% | $48.04M+7.3% | $48.52M+15.2% | |
| Other | $45.92M+122% | $36.38M+118% | $18.13M+146% | $17.46M+200% | $20.69M+342% | |
| Silver | $468.64M+52.0% | $384.44M+41.2% | $353.33M+40.2% | $326.21M+39.4% | $308.28M+49.9% | |
| Zinc | $5.32M+53.2% | $4.54M+23.3% | $3.85M-21.1% | $3.32M-38.4% | $3.47M-26.9% | |
| Average price per ounce/pound (in dollars per ounce/pound) by Product | ||||||
| Lead | $3.55-5.3% | $3.58-5.5% | $3.61-5.7% | $3.67-4.9% | $3.75-2.3% | |
| Silver | $191.98+60.7% | $154.31+38.6% | $134.84+29.4% | $126.14+29.9% | $119.43+27.2% | |
| Zinc | $5.15-1.2% | $5.1+0.2% | $5.12+4.5% | $5.17+9.3% | $5.21+14.3% | |
| Notional ounce/pound by Product | ||||||
| Zinc | $3.6M— | $2.4M— | —— | —— | —— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does SSR Mining break its business down?
- SSR Mining (SSRM) reports revenue by business across 4 parts — CC&V, Marigold, Puna and Seabee. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does SSR Mining's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in SSR Mining's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
