Skip to content

Virtu Financial VIRT Receivables for Securities Failed to Deliver

Receivables for Securities Failed to Deliver at other companies

LPL Financial Holdings logo
LPL Financial HoldingsLPLA
$9.96M+42.1%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$1.1B+30.7%
Net income$182.3M+82.9%
EPS (diluted)$1.99+84.3%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$1.0B+33.6%
Total debt$2.3B+15.8%
Total equity$1.7B+32.5%
Total assets$25.1B+43.1%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$149.0K-101%
CapEx$5.6M-2.2%
Free cash flow-$5.8M-162%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$5.49B+15.4%
Enterprise value$6.76B+12.4%
P/E10×-4.9×
P/S1.4×-0.1×

Profitability

See full
Net margin14.2%+3.7pp
FCF margin12.4%-20.0pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity36.2%+10.8pp
Debt / equity1.3×-0.2×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Virtu Financial in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:SecuritiesFailedToDeliver.

The official record: Virtu Financial’s 10-Q, filed May 1, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Virtu Financial's receivables for securities failed to deliver.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Virtu Financial's receivables for securities failed to deliver?
Virtu Financial (VIRT) reported receivables for securities failed to deliver of $380.77M in Q1 2026.
How has Virtu Financial's receivables for securities failed to deliver changed year-over-year?
Virtu Financial's receivables for securities failed to deliver increased by 79.3% year-over-year, from $212.36M to $380.77M.
What is the long-term trend for Virtu Financial's receivables for securities failed to deliver?
Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Virtu Financial's receivables for securities failed to deliver has grown at a -10.0% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $372.97M to $220.33M.
What does receivables for securities failed to deliver mean?
Amounts due from other broker-dealers for securities sold that were not delivered by the established settlement date. High levels of these receivables can indicate operational friction or counterparty settlement risk within the trading ecosystem.