Skip to content

TeraWulf WULF Consolidation — Operating Income

Discontinued — last reported Q2 '18

Similar metrics at other companies

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. logo
WTSCorporate Non — Operating Income
-$11.9M-28.0%
BWX Technologies logo
BWXTCorporate Non — Operating Income
-$2.04M+69.4%
Westlake logo
WLKCorporate Non — Operating Income
-$25M-25.0%
Snap-on logo
SNACorporate Non — Operating Income
-$23.6M-6.3%
Broadridge Financial Solutions logo
BRCorporate Non — Operating Income
-$19.75M-7.5%
Modine Manufacturing logo
MODCorporate Non — Operating Income
-$11.2M+17.0%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$34.0M-1.1%
Gross profit$31.7M+221%
Operating income-$162.1M-172%
Net income-$427.6M-596%
EPS (diluted)-$1.01-531%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$3.1B+1,318%
Total debt$3.7B+959%
Total equity-$78.8M-146%
Total assets$7.0B+733%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$17.6M-131%
CapEx$523.0M+458%
Free cash flow-$540.5M-1,353%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$14.36B+484%
Enterprise value$14.94B+470%
P/S85.5×+66.8×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin64%+19.1pp
Operating margin-171.8%+398pp
Net margin-611.5%-747pp
FCF margin-1,003.6%-1,433pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-343.7%-382pp
Debt / equity25.4×+25.4×
Current ratio1.2×-0.7×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by TeraWulf in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss.

The official record: TeraWulf’s 10-Q, filed August 13, 2018, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Questions, answered.

What does consolidation — operating income mean?
The profit or loss generated by the company's central corporate functions, excluding direct mining operations.
How do you interpret consolidation — operating income?
A narrowing loss or increasing income indicates improved corporate efficiency and better management of overhead costs.
How does consolidation — operating income compare across companies?
Publicly traded mining companies typically show negative operating income in corporate segments due to high G&A and executive compensation costs.