Skip to content

ZipRecruiter ZIP Ratios & Valuation

Q1 '26Q4 '25Q3 '25Q2 '25Q1 '25
Profitability
Gross margin89.1%-0.1pp89.2%-0.1pp89.4%-0.1pp89.5%0.0pp89.5%+0.1pp
Net margin-5.6%+1.8pp-7.3%+2.2pp-9.6%-1.7pp-7.9%-3.8pp-4.2%-1.4pp
EBITDA margin1.5%+2.2pp-0.8%+1.4pp-2.1%-0.4pp-1.7%-3.4pp1.7%-2.3pp
Free cash flow margin3.7%+1.5pp2.2%-1.0pp3.2%-1.5pp4.7%-2.4pp7.1%-2.4pp
Returns
Return on assets-4.2%+1.1pp-5.3%+1.7pp-7%-1.3pp-5.7%-2.7pp-3%-1.0pp
Return on invested capital-2.1%+2.9pp-5%+2.3pp-7.3%-0.4pp-6.9%-5.4pp-1.5%-3.5pp
Efficiency
Asset turnover0.8×0.0×0.7×0.0×0.7×0.0×0.7×0.0×0.7×0.0×
Liquidity
Current ratio7.3×+0.9×6.3×+0.4×+0.5×5.5×-1.5×+0.4×
Quick ratio7.3×+0.9×6.3×+0.4×+0.5×5.5×-1.5×+0.4×
Cash ratio4.2×+1.6×2.7×-0.2×2.8×+0.4×2.4×-0.6×3.1×+0.4×
Leverage
Debt-to-assets0.0×0.0×0.0×0.9×+0.1×0.9×0.0×
Net debt / EBITDA46.7×43×+25.2×
Interest coverage-0.2×+0.3×-0.5×+0.2×-0.8×-0.1×-0.7×-0.5×-0.2×-0.4×
Per Share
Book value per share-$1.00-16.5%-$0.86+2.6%-$0.88-21.3%-$0.73-530%-$0.12-185%
Valuation
Market capitalization$323.64M-30.5%$326.85M-9.4%$360.72M-23.3%$470.09M-19.0%$580.26M-18.0%
Enterprise value$630.04M-20.9%$696.51M-1.5%$707.16M-14.3%$824.99M-9.5%$911.48M-12.3%
Price / sales0.7×-0.3×0.7×-0.1×0.8×-0.2×-0.2×1.3×-0.2×
EV / EBITDA96.1×-7.4×118.4×+62.6×
EV / sales1.4×-0.3×1.6×0.0×1.6×-0.3×1.8×-0.1×-0.2×
Free cash flow yield5.1%-1.9pp3%-0.9pp4%-0.5pp4.5%-1.1pp5.6%-0.7pp
Earnings yield-7.7%-3.6pp-10.1%+1.8pp-11.9%-4.3pp-7.6%-4.3pp-3.3%-1.5pp

Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.

Compare these in charts →

Questions, answered.

What are ZipRecruiter's profit margins?
ZipRecruiter (ZIP) runs a 89.1% gross margin and a 3.7% operating margin, with a -5.6% net margin.
Where do ZipRecruiter's ratios come from?
Every ratio is computed from ZipRecruiter's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.