Celcuity CELC Ratios & Valuation
| Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | ||||||
| Return on equity | -275.2%-160pp | -163.8%-76.3pp | -122%-44.6pp | -134.5%-77.0pp | -115.4%-58.2pp | |
| Return on assets | -61.4%+1.2pp | -49.8%+1.5pp | -43.4%+1.8pp | -62.5%-25.4pp | -62.6%-21.0pp | |
| Return on invested capital | -168.1%-88.0pp | —— | -75.5%-19.8pp | -82.6%-36.0pp | -80.2%-23.2pp | |
| Liquidity | ||||||
| Current ratio | 12.3×+5.7× | 10.5×+2.8× | 12.3×+1.9× | 4.6×-10.4× | 6.6×-4.6× | |
| Quick ratio | 12.3×+5.7× | 10.5×+2.8× | 12.3×+1.9× | 4.6×-10.4× | 6.6×-4.6× | |
| Cash ratio | 4.4×+3.9× | 8.8×+8.1× | 1.9×+1.4× | 1.2×-0.4× | 0.5×-1.4× | |
| Leverage | ||||||
| Debt-to-equity | 2.6×+1.4× | 1.4×+0.5× | 1.2×+0.5× | 2.4×+1.8× | 1.2×+0.9× | |
| Debt-to-assets | 0.3×-0.1× | 0.3×-0.1× | 0.3×-0.1× | 0.6×+0.2× | 0.5×+0.3× | |
| Interest coverage | -9.3×+1.2× | -10×+1.0× | -11.2×+0.3× | -11.3×+2.0× | -10.5×+3.4× | |
| Per Share | ||||||
| Book value per share | $0.98-51.2% | $2.15-26.6% | $2.46-29.7% | $1.02-77.9% | $2.01-49.4% | |
| Valuation | ||||||
| Market capitalization | $5.52B+1,370% | $4.62B+850% | $2.1B+280% | $460.08M-20.0% | $375.38M-31.1% | |
| Enterprise value | $5.51B+1,086% | $4.37B+667% | $2.16B+235% | $519.45M-20.0% | $464.43M-15.9% | |
| Price / book | 103.1×+98.7× | 45.9×+41.7× | 17.9×+14.2× | 10.4×+7.1× | 4.3×+0.3× | |
| Free cash flow yield | -3.1%+24.2pp | -3.3%+13.9pp | -6.9%+6.6pp | -26.2%-14.6pp | -27.3%-16.6pp | |
| Earnings yield | -3.5%+30.4pp | -3.8%+19.2pp | -7.8%+9.3pp | -32.3%-18.0pp | -33.9%-20.4pp |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- Where do Celcuity's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Celcuity's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.