Skip to content

Central Garden & Pet Company CENT Impairment of intangibles

Impairment of intangibles at other companies

Synaptics logo
SynapticsSYNA
$0-100%
CarGurus, Inc. logo
CarGurus, Inc.CARG
$1.65M-13.2%
Haemonetics logo
HaemoneticsHAE
$21.64M+3,520%
Paycom Software logo
Paycom SoftwarePAYC
$0
Global Net Lease logo
Global Net LeaseGNL
$11.12M-81.6%
StepStone Group Inc. logo
StepStone Group Inc.STEP
$0

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$906.2M+8.7%
Gross profit$299.6M+9.7%
Operating income$113.9M+22.1%
Net income$79.4M+24.8%
EPS (diluted)$1.28+30.6%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$669.4M+26.0%
Total debt$1.4B-0.4%
Total equity$1.7B+7.1%
Total assets$3.7B+3.2%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$49.6M-5.9%
CapEx$10.5M-1.9%
Free cash flow-$60.1M-4.5%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$2.71B-4.7%
Enterprise value$3.46B-7.8%
P/E14.9×
P/S0.9×0.0×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin32.2%+2.0pp
Operating margin8.4%
Net margin5.7%
FCF margin8.9%-1.6pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity11.4%
Debt / equity0.9×-0.1×
Current ratio3.4×+0.1×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Central Garden & Pet Company in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept cent:ImpairmentOfIntangibleAssetsExcludingGoodwillNet.

The official record: Central Garden & Pet Company’s 10-K, filed November 26, 2025, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Central Garden & Pet Company's impairment of intangibles.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Central Garden & Pet Company's impairment of intangibles?
Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) reported impairment of intangibles of $254.5K in Q3 2025.
How has Central Garden & Pet Company's impairment of intangibles changed year-over-year?
Central Garden & Pet Company's impairment of intangibles decreased by 92.0% year-over-year, from $3.2M to $254.5K.
What does impairment of intangibles mean?
This metric measures the reduction in the carrying value of intangible assets, such as trademarks or patents, when their fair value falls below their book value. It serves as a non-cash charge that signals potential overvaluation or declining competitive utility of acquired assets. High or frequent impairment charges may indicate poor historical capital allocation or deteriorating market position for specific brands.