Skip to content

Synaptics SYNA Impairment of intangible assets

Impairment of intangible assets at other companies

American Healthcare REIT logo
American Healthcare REITAHR
$0
General Motors logo
General MotorsGM
$35.5M0.0%
Synaptics logo
SynapticsSYNA
$0-100%
Teledyne Technologies logo
Teledyne TechnologiesTDY
$0-100%
Paycom Software logo
Paycom SoftwarePAYC
$0
Ciena logo
CienaCIEN
$22.28M

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$294.2M+10.4%
Gross profit$133.3M+15.1%
Operating income-$12.7M+51.7%
Net income-$8.0M+63.3%
EPS (diluted)-$0.21+62.5%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$404.4M+12.2%
Total debt$879.4M-0.2%
Total equity$1.4B-2.0%
Total assets$2.5B-1.2%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow$21.8M-70.3%
CapEx$11.9M+120%
Free cash flow$9.9M-85.4%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$5.44B+8.6%

Profitability

See full
Gross margin43.6%-1.9pp
Operating margin-6.4%-1.6pp
Net margin-4.1%-20.0pp
FCF margin8.3%-3.6pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-3.5%-16.1pp
Debt / equity0.6×0.0×
Current ratio+0.2×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Synaptics in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:ImpairmentOfIntangibleAssetsFinitelived.

The official record: Synaptics’s 10-Q, filed May 7, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Synaptics's impairment of intangible assets.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Synaptics's impairment of intangible assets?
Synaptics (SYNA) reported impairment of intangible assets of $0 in Q1 2026.
How has Synaptics's impairment of intangible assets changed year-over-year?
Synaptics's impairment of intangible assets decreased by 100.0% year-over-year, from $13.8M to $0.
What does impairment of intangible assets mean?
This metric captures the non-cash charge recognized when the carrying value of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, indicating a decline in the asset's expected future economic benefit. It serves as a critical indicator of potential overvaluation of past acquisitions or shifts in market conditions that diminish the utility of intellectual property or brand assets. High or frequent impairment charges often signal management's struggle to realize the anticipated synergies from strategic investments.