Financial Institutions FISI Impaired Financing Receivable with No Related Allowance - Unpaid Principal Balance
Impaired Financing Receivable with No Related Allowance - Unpaid Principal Balance at other companies
Other financials
Where this comes from
Reported directly by Financial Institutions in its filing.
Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:FinancingReceivableNonaccrualNoAllowance.
The official record: Financial Institutions’s 10-Q, filed May 4, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →
Ask your AI about Financial Institutions's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance.
Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.
Connect your AI
Claude
Questions, answered.
- What is Financial Institutions's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance?
- Financial Institutions (FISI) reported impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance of $38.1M in Q1 2026.
- How has Financial Institutions's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance changed year-over-year?
- Financial Institutions's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance increased by 27.2% year-over-year, from $29.96M to $38.1M.
- What is the long-term trend for Financial Institutions's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance?
- Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Financial Institutions's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance has grown at a 29.7% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $8.62M to $31.57M.
- What does impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance mean?
- This metric captures the unpaid principal balance of financing receivables that have been identified as impaired but do not currently have a specific allowance for credit losses allocated against them. It highlights loans where the institution believes the collateral value or expected cash flows are sufficient to cover the debt, despite the impairment status. Investors use this to evaluate the bank's judgment regarding asset recovery and the adequacy of its overall credit loss provisioning strategy.