Graham Corporation GHM Income Statement
| Q4 '26 | Q3 '26 | Q2 '26 | Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| —— | $169K+32.0% | $68K-55.6% | $177K+9.9% | $141K— | ||
| $67.08M+13.0% | $56.7M+20.5% | $66.03M+23.3% | $55.49M+11.1% | $59.35M+20.9% | ||
| $51.82M+19.6% | $43.23M+22.3% | $51.72M+26.9% | $40.77M+8.5% | $43.34M+19.1% | ||
| $15.25M-4.7% | $13.47M+15.3% | $14.31M+11.8% | $14.72M+19.0% | $16.01M+26.1% | ||
| 22.7%-4.2pp | 23.8%-1.1pp | 21.7%-2.2pp | 26.5%+1.8pp | 27%+1.1pp | ||
| $12.25M+18.6% | $10.13M+9.4% | $9.79M+12.2% | $9.4M+6.3% | $10.32M-3.1% | ||
| $135K-49.8% | $219K-0.5% | $191K-68.0% | $76K-41.5% | $269K+436% | ||
| $2.66M-51.8% | $3.12M+41.4% | $4.27M+0.9% | $4.96M+54.0% | $5.52M+262% | ||
| 4%-5.3pp | 5.5%+0.8pp | 6.5%-1.4pp | 8.9%+2.5pp | 9.3%+6.2pp | ||
| $2.32M-58.3% | $3.2M+42.5% | $4.22M-1.7% | $5.01M+52.2% | $5.57M+282% | ||
| $351K-70.1% | $358K-45.7% | $1.13M+11.5% | $418K+27.4% | $1.17M+887% | ||
| $1.97M-55.2% | $2.85M+79.2% | $3.09M-5.8% | $4.6M+54.9% | $4.4M+228% | ||
| 2.9%-4.5pp | 5%+1.6pp | 4.7%-1.4pp | 8.3%+2.3pp | 7.4%+4.7pp | ||
| $0.17-57.5% | $0.25+78.6% | $0.28-6.7% | $0.42+55.6% | $0.40+233% | ||
| $0.18-55.0% | $0.26+73.3% | $0.28-6.7% | $0.42+55.6% | $0.40+233% | ||
| 11.1M+0.7% | 11.2M+0.9% | 11.1M+1.0% | 11M+0.7% | 11.1M+2.0% | ||
| 11M+1.0% | 11M+0.9% | 11M+0.9% | 10.9M+0.6% | 10.9M+1.3% | ||
| $999K+80.0% | $510K-7.9% | $498K-10.3% | $499K-9.9% | $555K-17.2% | ||
| $1.97M+25.9% | -$230K-147% | $0— | $262K+165% | $1.56M+211% | ||
| $1.67M+65.7% | $1.5M+51.3% | $1.15M+32.8% | $1.02M+19.5% | $1.01M+11.8% | ||
| $38K— | $76K+195% | $12K-75.0% | $53K+857% | —— | ||
| —— | -$9.39M-490% | $6.02M+149% | -$3.32M-265% | —— | ||
| -$1.76M— | -$11.27M— | $7.94M+202% | -$839K+89.0% | —— | ||
| $2.08M+190% | $7.67M— | $10.77M+1,390% | $865K-92.8% | $716K+212% | ||
| —— | $6.98M+7.1% | $22.12M— | -$1.27M-108% | —— | ||
| —— | -$258K— | -$1.12M-1,003% | -$123K— | $2.19M+250% | ||
| —— | $6.07M-19.2% | $5.04M+507% | -$2.64M-308% | $999K-46.4% | ||
| $125K-76.2% | -$381K— | $210K-74.1% | $167K-82.0% | $525K-22.0% | ||
| —— | $169K+32.0% | $68K-55.6% | $177K+9.9% | $141K— | ||
| $13.28M— | -$86K-7.5% | $375K— | -$1.61M-81.6% | —— | ||
| -$28.84M-459% | -$3.08M+58.1% | -$4.14M-18.9% | -$7M-122% | -$5.16M-28.1% | ||
| $0— | $4.76M-8.9% | $13.58M-2.5% | -$2.26M-126% | —— | ||
| $180K+97.8% | $90K-1.1% | $116K+27.5% | $128K+40.7% | $91K-3.2% | ||
| $135K-49.8% | $219K-0.5% | $191K-68.0% | $76K-41.5% | $269K+436% | ||
| $2.57M-50.1% | $2.33M-68.2% | $4.14M+18.9% | $7M+135% | $5.16M+27.9% | ||
| $67.08M+13.0% | $56.7M+20.5% | $66.03M+23.3% | $55.49M+11.1% | $59.35M+20.9% | ||
| $484K+11.0% | $435K-0.2% | $437K0.0% | $436K0.0% | $436K0.0% | ||
| $404K-46.3% | $642K+50.7% | $553K+27.4% | $532K+54.7% | $753K+172% | ||
| $2.66M-51.8% | $3.12M+41.4% | $4.27M+0.9% | $4.96M+54.0% | $5.52M+262% | ||
| $5.32M-24.8% | $5.13M+36.7% | $5.92M+4.6% | $6.49M+40.0% | $7.08M+129% | ||
| $5.32M-24.8% | $5.13M+36.7% | $5.92M+4.6% | $6.49M+40.0% | $7.08M+129% | ||
| 7.9%-4.0pp | 9.1%+1.1pp | 9%-1.6pp | 11.7%+2.4pp | 11.9%+5.6pp | ||
| $2.66M-51.8% | $3.12M+41.4% | $4.27M+0.9% | $4.96M+54.0% | $5.52M+262% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What is Graham Corporation's revenue?
- Graham Corporation (GHM) generated $245.3M in revenue over the trailing twelve months, up 16.9% year over year.
- Is Graham Corporation profitable?
- Graham Corporation reported $12.5M in net income over the trailing twelve months, a 5.1% net margin.
- What are Graham Corporation's profit margins?
- Gross margin is 23.5% and operating margin is 6.1%, with a 5.1% net margin.
- What is Graham Corporation's earnings per share?
- Graham Corporation's diluted EPS over the trailing twelve months is $1.12.
- Where does Graham Corporation's income statement data come from?
- Every line is extracted from Graham Corporation's SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q) and tagged in XBRL. Switch between quarterly, annual, and trailing-twelve-month views, or open any line for its full history and peer comparisons.
