Chart Industries GTLS Ratios & Valuation
| Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | ||||||
| Gross margin | 32.5%-1.3pp | 33.7%+0.3pp | 33.8%+0.6pp | 33.8%+1.4pp | 33.9%+2.2pp | |
| Operating margin | 6.2%-10.1pp | 8.4%-7.2pp | 9.8%-5.3pp | 16.2%+2.3pp | 16.3%+3.9pp | |
| Net margin | -0.6%-6.7pp | 1%-4.3pp | 1.6%-3.1pp | 6.4%+3.3pp | 6.1%+4.1pp | |
| Returns | ||||||
| Return on equity | -0.8%-9.8pp | 1.3%-6.4pp | 2.2%-4.6pp | 9%+4.4pp | 9%+6.2pp | |
| Return on invested capital | 3.9%-3.9pp | 5.6%-1.9pp | 5.4%-1.6pp | 7.8%+1.4pp | 7.8%+2.3pp | |
| Efficiency | ||||||
| Asset turnover | 0.4×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.4×0.0× | 0.4×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | |
| Liquidity | ||||||
| Current ratio | 1.5×0.0× | 1.4×0.0× | 1.4×+0.1× | 1.5×+0.3× | 1.5×+0.3× | |
| Leverage | ||||||
| Debt-to-equity | 1.2×0.0× | 1.1×-0.2× | 1.2×-0.3× | 1.1×-0.4× | 1.3×-0.3× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.7×+3.0× | 5.2×+1.4× | 4.8×+0.3× | 3.6×-1.5× | 3.7×-2.0× | |
| Per Share | ||||||
| Book value per share | $65.98-0.5% | $71.20+17.5% | $71.24+11.9% | $74.25+27.6% | $66.30+13.1% | |
| Valuation | ||||||
| Market capitalization | $9.9B+50.0% | $9.27B+13.5% | $9B+69.3% | $6.68B+8.1% | $6.6B-5.3% | |
| Price / sales | 2.4×+0.8× | 2.2×+0.2× | 2.1×+0.8× | 1.6×0.0× | 1.6×-0.3× | |
| Price / book | 3.1×+0.9× | 2.9×0.0× | 2.8×+1.0× | 2×-0.3× | 2.2×-0.3× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.8×+14.2× | 19.7×+7.0× | 17.6×+7.2× | 10.5×-2.2× | 10.6×-4.6× |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What are Chart Industries's profit margins?
- Chart Industries (GTLS) runs a 32.5% gross margin and a 6.2% operating margin, with a -0.6% net margin.
- Where do Chart Industries's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Chart Industries's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
