Gladstone Land LAND Business Segments
| Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acre-feet of Water Assets by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Colorado | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Delaware | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Florida | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Fresno, CA | 7.3K+3.2% | 7.2K+2.0% | 7.2K+31.9% | 7K+23.5% | 7K+129% | |
| Georgia | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Kern, CA | 48.3K0.0% | 48.3K0.0% | 48.3K0.0% | 48.3K0.0% | 48.3K+5.0% | |
| Maryland | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Michigan | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Nebraska | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| New Jersey | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Oregon | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| South Carolina | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Texas | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Washington | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Net Cost Basis by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | $47.81M-2.9% | $48.23M-3.2% | $48.7M-3.6% | $49.09M-3.9% | $49.25M-4.3% | |
| Colorado | $38.01M-16.4% | $38.08M-16.5% | $45.31M-0.8% | $45.4M-0.8% | $45.49M-0.8% | |
| Delaware | $1.26M-1.2% | $1.27M-1.2% | $1.27M-1.2% | $1.28M-0.9% | $1.28M-1.4% | |
| Florida | $111.58M-13.5% | $112.96M-32.1% | $113.36M-31.8% | $128.59M-22.8% | $129M-22.8% | |
| Georgia | $2.22M-4.8% | $2.25M+1.1% | $2.28M+1.1% | $2.3M-9.8% | $2.33M-10.1% | |
| Maryland | $7.81M-1.3% | $7.84M-1.3% | $7.88M-1.3% | $7.92M-0.9% | $7.92M-1.3% | |
| Michigan | $14.39M-4.5% | $14.68M-3.5% | $14.81M-27.0% | $14.94M-33.9% | $15.07M-34.0% | |
| Nebraska | $19.73M-0.4% | $19.74M-34.0% | $19.76M-34.3% | $19.78M-34.6% | $19.81M-34.9% | |
| New Jersey | $2.01M-1.7% | $2.03M-1.7% | $2.04M-0.9% | $2.04M-1.3% | $2.05M-1.9% | |
| Oregon | $28.92M-0.3% | $29.18M+0.7% | $29.32M+0.4% | $29.27M+0.5% | $29.02M-1.4% | |
| South Carolina | $3.34M-2.6% | $3.36M-2.6% | $3.38M-2.6% | $3.41M-2.6% | $3.43M-2.6% | |
| Texas | $9.3M+3.4% | $9.33M+16.2% | $9.39M+16.7% | $8.97M+11.3% | $8.99M+11.2% | |
| Washington | $50.36M-8.8% | $51.16M-8.9% | $52.06M-8.7% | $54.57M-5.9% | $55.22M-6.2% | |
| Total Acres by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | $6.32K0.0% | $6.32K0.0% | $6.32K0.0% | $6.32K0.0% | $6.32K0.0% | |
| Colorado | $31.45K-4.0% | $31.45K-4.0% | $32.77K0.0% | $32.77K0.0% | $32.77K0.0% | |
| Delaware | $1800.0% | $1800.0% | $1800.0% | $1800.0% | $1800.0% | |
| Florida | $10.41K-20.5% | $10.41K-44.4% | $10.41K-44.4% | $13.09K-30.1% | $13.09K+249% | |
| Georgia | $2300.0% | $2300.0% | $2300.0% | $2300.0% | $2300.0% | |
| Maryland | $9870.0% | $9870.0% | $9870.0% | $9870.0% | $9870.0% | |
| Michigan | $1.25K0.0% | $1.25K0.0% | $1.25K-34.2% | $1.25K-34.2% | $1.25K-34.2% | |
| Nebraska | $5.22K0.0% | $5.22K-32.9% | $5.22K-32.9% | $5.22K-32.9% | $5.22K-32.9% | |
| New Jersey | $1160.0% | $1160.0% | $1160.0% | $1160.0% | $1160.0% | |
| Oregon | $8980.0% | $8980.0% | $8980.0% | $8980.0% | $8980.0% | |
| South Carolina | $5970.0% | $5970.0% | $5970.0% | $5970.0% | $5970.0% | |
| Texas | $3.67K0.0% | $3.67K0.0% | $3.67K0.0% | $3.67K0.0% | $3.67K0.0% | |
| Washington | $2.52K0.0% | $2.52K0.0% | $2.52K0.0% | $2.52K0.0% | $2.52K0.0% | |
| Farm acres by Geography | ||||||
| Kern, CA | 2.4K0.0% | 2.4K— | 2.4K— | 2.4K— | 2.4K— | |
| Umatilla LLC | 165— | —— | —— | —— | —— | |
| Number of properties by Geography | ||||||
| Kern, CA | 2— | 2— | —— | —— | —— | |
| St.Lucie County Florida | 1— | 1— | 1— | —— | —— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Gladstone Land break its business down?
- Gladstone Land (LAND) reports acre-feet of water assets by geography across 15 parts — Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Florida and Fresno, CA. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Gladstone Land's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Gladstone Land's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
