Gladstone Land LAND Business Segments
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acre-feet of Water Assets by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Colorado | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Delaware | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Florida | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Fresno, CA | 28.7K+13.6% | 28.5K+33.8% | 28.3K+93.9% | 26.6K— | 25.3K— | |
| Georgia | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Kern, CA | 193.2K0.0% | 193.2K+1.2% | 193.2K+34.5% | 193.2K+37.7% | 193.2K+41.0% | |
| Maryland | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Michigan | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Nebraska | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| New Jersey | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Oregon | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| South Carolina | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Texas | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Washington | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | 0— | |
| Net Cost Basis by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | $193.83M-3.4% | $195.27M-3.8% | $196.88M-4.0% | $198.69M-4.2% | $200.69M-4.2% | |
| Colorado | $166.8M-8.6% | $174.28M-4.7% | $181.78M-0.8% | $182.14M-0.8% | $182.5M-0.8% | |
| Delaware | $5.07M-1.1% | $5.09M-1.1% | $5.1M-1.2% | $5.12M-1.2% | $5.13M-1.3% | |
| Florida | $466.49M-25.8% | $483.91M-27.4% | $537.42M-25.5% | $590.37M-23.9% | $628.38M-24.3% | |
| Georgia | $9.04M-3.3% | $9.16M-4.8% | $9.13M-6.0% | $9.11M-9.9% | $9.36M-8.5% | |
| Maryland | $31.45M-1.2% | $31.55M-1.2% | $31.66M-1.1% | $31.76M-0.9% | $31.83M-1.0% | |
| Michigan | $58.82M-19.6% | $59.5M-26.5% | $60.03M-32.4% | $65.51M-28.6% | $73.18M-21.0% | |
| Nebraska | $79.01M-28.2% | $79.09M-34.4% | $89.24M-26.3% | $99.54M-18.1% | $109.99M-9.8% | |
| New Jersey | $8.12M-1.4% | $8.15M-1.4% | $8.19M-1.5% | $8.21M-2.0% | $8.23M-2.0% | |
| Oregon | $116.69M+0.3% | $116.79M0.0% | $116.6M-0.6% | $116.47M-1.2% | $116.33M-1.9% | |
| South Carolina | $13.49M-2.6% | $13.58M-2.6% | $13.67M-2.6% | $13.76M-2.6% | $13.85M-2.5% | |
| Texas | $36.98M+11.7% | $36.68M+13.8% | $35.37M+9.5% | $34.03M+5.2% | $33.12M+2.1% | |
| Washington | $208.14M-8.1% | $213M-7.4% | $218.01M-6.7% | $222.96M-6.4% | $226.42M-6.8% | |
| Total Acres by Geography | ||||||
| Arizona | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | |
| Colorado | $128.44K-2.0% | $129.77K-1.0% | $131.09K0.0% | $131.09K0.0% | $131.09K0.0% | |
| Delaware | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | |
| Florida | $44.33K-36.0% | $47K-21.5% | $55.31K-13.1% | $63.62K-5.6% | $69.25K+41.8% | |
| Georgia | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | |
| Maryland | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | |
| Michigan | $4.98K-20.6% | $4.98K-28.0% | $4.98K-34.2% | $5.63K-25.6% | $6.27K-17.1% | |
| Nebraska | $20.89K-26.9% | $20.89K-32.9% | $23.45K-24.7% | $26.01K-16.4% | $28.57K-8.2% | |
| New Jersey | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | |
| Oregon | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | |
| South Carolina | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | |
| Texas | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | |
| Washington | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K-0.1% | $10.08K-0.2% | |
| Farm acres by Geography | ||||||
| Kern, CA | 9.6K— | 9.6K— | —— | —— | —— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Gladstone Land break its business down?
- Gladstone Land (LAND) reports acre-feet of water assets by geography across 15 parts — Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Florida and Fresno, CA. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Gladstone Land's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Gladstone Land's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
