Gladstone Land LAND Business Segments
| FY'25 | FY'24 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Acre-feet of Water Assets by Geography | |||
| Arizona | 0— | 0— | |
| Colorado | 0— | 0— | |
| Delaware | 0— | 0— | |
| Florida | 0— | 0— | |
| Fresno, CA | 28.5K+33.8% | 21.3K— | |
| Georgia | 0— | 0— | |
| Kern, CA | 193.2K+1.2% | 190.9K+40.4% | |
| Maryland | 0— | 0— | |
| Michigan | 0— | 0— | |
| Nebraska | 0— | 0— | |
| New Jersey | 0— | 0— | |
| Oregon | 0— | 0— | |
| South Carolina | 0— | 0— | |
| Texas | 0— | 0— | |
| Washington | 0— | 0— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Gladstone Land break its business down?
- Gladstone Land (LAND) reports acre-feet of water assets by geography across 15 parts — Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Florida and Fresno, CA. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Gladstone Land's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Gladstone Land's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
