Lincoln Educational Services Corporation LINC Ratios & Valuation
| FY'25 | FY'24 | FY'23 | FY'22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | |||||
| Gross margin | 60.4%+1.7pp | 58.7%+1.6pp | 57.1%-0.2pp | 57.3%-1.3pp | |
| Operating margin | 5.8%+2.4pp | 3.4%-5.4pp | 8.8%+4.1pp | 4.7%-10.0pp | |
| Net margin | 3.9%+1.6pp | 2.2%-4.6pp | 6.9%+3.2pp | 3.6%-6.7pp | |
| Returns | |||||
| Return on equity | 10.6%+4.8pp | 5.7%-10.9pp | 16.7%+7.5pp | 9.2%-22.3pp | |
| Return on invested capital | 6.9%+2.8pp | 4.1%-8.1pp | 12.2%+4.8pp | 7.4%-17.2pp | |
| Efficiency | |||||
| Asset turnover | 1.1×0.0× | 1.1×-0.1× | 1.2×0.0× | 1.2×-0.1× | |
| Liquidity | |||||
| Current ratio | 0.9×-0.4× | 1.2×-0.6× | 1.8×-0.2× | 2.1×+0.2× | |
| Leverage | |||||
| Debt-to-equity | 1×0.0× | 1×+0.3× | 0.7×0.0× | 0.7×-0.1× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.6×-0.9× | 4.5×+3.5× | 0.9×-1.3× | 2.2×+2.0× | |
| Per Share | |||||
| Book value per share | $6.39+10.7% | $5.77+5.7% | $5.46-2.4% | $5.60+8.5% | |
| Valuation | |||||
| Market capitalization | $1.52B+114% | $498M+64.6% | $302.47M+99.0% | $152.02M-24.6% | |
| Price / earnings | 67.7×+8.8× | 50.3×+38.7× | 11.6×-0.4× | 12×+6.2× | |
| Price / sales | 2.8×+1.2× | 1.1×+0.3× | 0.8×+0.4× | 0.4×-0.2× | |
| Price / book | 7.6×+3.6× | 2.8×+1.0× | 1.8×+0.8× | 1×-0.5× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.3×+2.8× | 23.2×+14.8× | 8.5×-0.5× | 8.9×+5.1× |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What are Lincoln Educational Services Corporation's profit margins?
- Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) runs a 60.3% gross margin and a 6.1% operating margin, with a 4.1% net margin.
- Where do Lincoln Educational Services Corporation's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Lincoln Educational Services Corporation's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
