Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. OPTX Ratios & Valuation
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | ||||||
| Gross margin | 18.8%-6.1pp | 23.3%+3.2pp | 20.6%-2.2pp | 23.3%-0.5pp | 25%+1.0pp | |
| Net margin | -11%-7.7pp | -6.4%+2.3pp | -10.7%-10.9pp | -5.5%-7.0pp | -3.2%-5.7pp | |
| Returns | ||||||
| Return on equity | -30%-21.9pp | -17.4%+3.1pp | -27.3%-27.8pp | -13.6%— | -8.2%— | |
| Return on invested capital | -13.3%— | -5.4%— | -13.1%— | —— | —— | |
| Efficiency | ||||||
| Asset turnover | 1.1×0.0× | 1.1×0.0× | 1.1×-0.3× | 1.1×-0.3× | 1.1×-0.3× | |
| Liquidity | ||||||
| Current ratio | 1.3×-0.1× | 1.3×0.0× | 1.2×-0.1× | 1.4×+0.1× | 1.4×0.0× | |
| Leverage | ||||||
| Debt-to-equity | 0.7×+0.1× | 0.5×-0.2× | 0.7×+0.1× | 0.6×— | 0.6×— | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 18.4×+15.4× | 2.3×-32.7× | 14.5×+10.5× | 3.6×— | 3×— | |
| Per Share | ||||||
| Book value per share | $0.24-23.3% | $0.26-14.1% | $0.27-19.6% | $0.30-9.8% | $0.31-4.8% | |
| Valuation | ||||||
| Market capitalization | $394.74M+747% | $105.59M+14.2% | $56.87M+26.0% | $49.53M-55.7% | $44.4M-68.2% | |
| Price / sales | 14.3×+12.7× | 3.8×+0.5× | 2×+0.5× | 1.7×-2.3× | 1.5×-3.3× | |
| Price / book | 45.3×+41.2× | 11.1×+2.7× | 5.8×+2.1× | 4.5×-4.7× | 3.9×-7.9× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 1,328.9×+1,304× | 61.7×-462× | 154.5×+124× | 30.7×— | 23.8×— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What are Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc.'s profit margins?
- Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (OPTX) runs a 18.8% gross margin and a -8.1% operating margin, with a -11.0% net margin.
- Where do Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc.'s ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc.'s SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
