Quanta Services PWR Ratios & Valuation
| FY'25 | FY'24 | FY'23 | FY'22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | |||||
| Gross margin | 60.2%+3.3pp | 56.8%-0.7pp | 57.5%-2.0pp | 59.5%-1.5pp | |
| Operating margin | 22.9%+1.2pp | 21.8%+0.7pp | 21.1%+2.1pp | 18.9%-3.7pp | |
| Net margin | 14.8%+0.3pp | 14.5%+1.4pp | 13.2%+1.4pp | 11.8%-5.7pp | |
| Returns | |||||
| Return on equity | 52.8%+1.2pp | 51.5%+6.2pp | 45.3%+7.6pp | 37.7%-10.2pp | |
| Return on invested capital | 38.8%+1.9pp | 36.9%+4.5pp | 32.4%+3.1pp | 29.4%-7.5pp | |
| Efficiency | |||||
| Asset turnover | 5.5×-0.1× | 5.6×+0.2× | 5.4×0.0× | 5.4×+0.2× | |
| Liquidity | |||||
| Current ratio | 5.2×0.0× | 5.2×-1.2× | 6.4×+0.1× | 6.3×-1.1× | |
| Leverage | |||||
| Debt-to-equity | 2.7×+0.2× | 2.6×-0.5× | 3×-0.1× | 3.1×+0.9× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.6×+0.7× | 7.9×-1.9× | 9.8×-1.5× | 11.3×+3.5× | |
| Per Share | |||||
| Book value per share | $215.96+18.6% | $182.14+15.3% | $157.93+12.1% | $140.85+9.5% | |
| Valuation | |||||
| Market capitalization | $217.52B+31.6% | $165.35B+48.4% | $111.42B+47.7% | $75.44B+30.1% | |
| Price / earnings | 219.1×+17.3× | 201.8×+22.9× | 178.9×+16.3× | 162.6×+50.4× | |
| Price / sales | 8.1×+0.8× | 7.3×+1.5× | 5.8×+1.1× | 4.8×-0.1× | |
| Price / book | 26.5×+2.3× | 24.2×+5.2× | 18.9×+4.5× | 14.5×+2.0× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 99.5×+4.8× | 94.6×+15.4× | 79.2×+12.5× | 66.8×+2.4× | |
| Dividend yield | 0.4%-0.1pp | 0.5%-0.2pp | 0.7%-0.2pp | 0.8%-0.1pp |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- What are Quanta Services's profit margins?
- Quanta Services (PWR) runs a 15.1% gross margin and a 5.7% operating margin, with a 3.7% net margin.
- Where do Quanta Services's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from Quanta Services's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
