Select Medical Holdings SEM Cash Flow Statement
| TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | TTM Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $203.58M-19.9% | $214.53M-27.7% | $180.55M-49.1% | $217.38M-35.0% | $254.27M-23.3% | ||
| $143.16M-22.5% | $140.3M-31.2% | $149.84M-29.4% | $165.54M-22.8% | $184.63M-12.2% | ||
| $17.45M-81.2% | $16.7M-83.4% | $73.45M+43.4% | $82.57M+67.4% | $92.95M+105% | ||
| $387.78M-33.3% | $346.47M-33.1% | $407.57M-28.7% | $413.24M-18.5% | $581.1M+25.3% | ||
| $235.78M+6.2% | $229.23M+3.2% | $233.55M+6.5% | $231.14M+5.6% | $222M-0.4% | ||
| $9.17M— | $9.2M— | $12.39M— | —— | —— | ||
| -$220.83M+2.1% | -$216.49M+6.3% | -$223.79M+1.2% | -$236.27M+3.3% | -$225.67M+12.2% | ||
| $31.13M-45.0% | $31.44M-51.4% | $39.81M-38.3% | $48.26M-25.0% | $56.63M-11.6% | ||
| $88.69M+79.9% | $100.08M+164% | $119.52M+509% | $134.07M+960% | $49.29M+286% | ||
| $1.14B-1.3% | $1.29B+4.0% | $1.26B+3.3% | $1.3B+9.3% | $1.15B-2.1% | ||
| -$105M-108% | $0-100% | $942.76M+96.4% | $1.21B+955% | $1.3B+2,269% | ||
| -$194.49M+50.7% | -$163.15M+47.6% | -$315.2M-36.2% | -$235.78M+6.8% | -$394.83M-99.5% | ||
| -$27.53M+30.1% | -$33.17M-36.4% | -$131.41M— | -$58.81M— | -$39.41M— | ||
| $152M-57.7% | $117.24M-60.3% | $174.02M-50.6% | $182.1M-36.9% | $359.1M+48.9% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How much cash does Select Medical Holdings generate?
- Select Medical Holdings (SEM) generated $387.8M in operating cash flow over the trailing twelve months.
- What is Select Medical Holdings's free cash flow?
- After $235.8M of capital expenditures, Select Medical Holdings's free cash flow was $152.0M over the trailing twelve months, down 57.7% year over year.
- Where does Select Medical Holdings's cash flow data come from?
- Every line is extracted from Select Medical Holdings's SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q) and tagged in XBRL. Switch between quarterly, annual, and trailing-twelve-month views, or open any line for its full history and peer comparisons.
