Skip to content

Stem STEM Impairment of deferred costs with suppliers

Impairment of deferred costs with suppliers at other companies

Veeva Systems logo
Veeva SystemsVEEV
$0
Momentus logo
MomentusMNTS
$417.25K
F5, Inc. logo
F5, Inc.FFIV
$0
T-Mobile US logo
T-Mobile USTMUS
$0
Brand Engagement Network, Inc. logo
Brand Engagement Network, Inc.BNAI
$3.37M
Accenture logo
AccentureACN
$79.08M-0.1%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$29.0M-10.8%
Gross profit$10.9M+3.0%
Operating income-$14.2M+32.8%
Net income-$18.9M+24.3%
EPS (diluted)-$2.22+27.2%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$38.4M-36.4%
Total debt$11.0M-12.2%
Total equity-$266.3M+36.2%
Total assets$281.9M-30.4%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$8.3M-197%
CapEx-
Free cash flow-$8.3M-197%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$69.95M+26.0%
Enterprise value$42.58M+72.6%
P/E0.5×
P/S0.5×+0.1×

Profitability

See full
Gross margin39.5%+23.8pp
Operating margin-31.9%-15.5pp
Net margin62.2%+33.8pp
FCF margin-6.5%-2.6pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity-37.8%+35.1pp
Debt / equity0.0×
Current ratio0.8×-0.1×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Stem in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept stem:ImpairmentOfDeferredCostsWithSuppliers.

The official record: Stem’s 10-K, filed March 5, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Stem's impairment of deferred costs with suppliers.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Stem's impairment of deferred costs with suppliers?
Stem (STEM) reported impairment of deferred costs with suppliers of $0 in Q4 2025.
How has Stem's impairment of deferred costs with suppliers changed year-over-year?
Stem's impairment of deferred costs with suppliers decreased by 100.0% year-over-year, from $3.35M to $0.
What does impairment of deferred costs with suppliers mean?
Represents the write-down of capitalized costs associated with future services or goods to be provided by suppliers. This occurs when the expected future economic benefit of these prepayments is deemed unrecoverable. It serves as an indicator of potential friction in vendor relationships or shifts in procurement strategy.