FactSet Research Systems FDS Cash Flow Statement
| TTM Q2 '26 | TTM Q1 '26 | TTM Q4 '25 | TTM Q3 '25 | TTM Q2 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $587.79M+8.3% | $599.6M+11.3% | $597.04M+11.2% | $532.92M+3.9% | $542.51M+10.9% | ||
| $171.4M+21.9% | $166.12M+24.1% | $157.69M+26.0% | $149.01M+26.4% | $140.66M+25.8% | ||
| $70.41M+12.3% | $66.09M+5.3% | $61.23M-3.6% | $63.95M-0.7% | $62.68M-4.3% | ||
| $798.91M+20.7% | $761.17M+20.5% | $726.26M+3.7% | $677.32M-2.2% | $661.72M-1.7% | ||
| $116.04M+19.7% | $113.78M+19.7% | $108.81M+27.0% | $100.8M+68.8% | $96.91M+50.5% | ||
| $5.79M-98.3% | $233.06M+102% | $348.26M— | $348.26M+1,376% | $342.46M+1,352% | ||
| -$76.55M+80.8% | -$243.39M+7.9% | -$392.77M-172% | -$409.03M-220% | -$399.12M-201% | ||
| $163.54M+5.3% | $162.14M+6.1% | $159.97M+6.2% | $157.7M+6.2% | $155.34M+6.9% | ||
| $490.25M+108% | $391.57M+74.7% | $300.46M+27.7% | $257.16M-8.7% | $236.21M-18.2% | ||
| $498.41M+63.4% | $748.41M+1,261% | $803.41M— | $803.41M— | $305M— | ||
| $605M+86.2% | $742.5M+197% | $805M+222% | $805M+222% | $325M+30.0% | ||
| -$748.94M-101% | -$552.79M-13.7% | -$432.35M+22.9% | -$381.8M+36.1% | -$371.69M+38.6% | ||
| —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | ||
| $682.87M+20.9% | $647.39M+20.7% | $617.45M+0.5% | $576.52M-9.0% | $564.82M-7.3% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How much cash does FactSet Research Systems generate?
- FactSet Research Systems (FDS) generated $798.9M in operating cash flow over the trailing twelve months.
- What is FactSet Research Systems's free cash flow?
- After $116.0M of capital expenditures, FactSet Research Systems's free cash flow was $682.9M over the trailing twelve months, up 20.9% year over year.
- Where does FactSet Research Systems's cash flow data come from?
- Every line is extracted from FactSet Research Systems's SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q) and tagged in XBRL. Switch between quarterly, annual, and trailing-twelve-month views, or open any line for its full history and peer comparisons.
