Connect your AI

Herbalife HLF Retention And Separation — Cumulative Realignment Cost Incurred

Similar metrics at other companies

TRSCorporate — Realignment and severance costs

$2.08M+137%

TRSCorporate Segment — Realignment, severance, and consulting costs

$1.4M-70.2%

EAT

EATSeparation costs

$100K-87.5%

LMBAcquisition-related retention expense and contingent consideration

$149K-65.1%

NOVTUnallocated Costs — Restructuring And Related Cost Incurred Cost

$856.75K+312%

EESeparation costs

$0-100%

Other financials

Income statement

Revenue$1.3B+7.8%

Gross profit$1.0B+7.3%

Operating income$138.4M+12.7%

Net income$61.9M+22.8%

EPS (diluted)$0.57+16.3%

Balance sheet

Cash & equivalents$451.2M+37.0%

Total debt$2.2B-9.1%

Total equity-$441.5M+40.0%

Total assets$2.9B+7.1%

Cash flow

Operating cash flow$113.8M+56,800%

CapEx$10.9M-40.4%

Free cash flow$102.9M+669%

Valuation

Market cap$1.29B+57.9%

Enterprise value$3.02B+4.6%

P/E5.4×+2.5×

P/S0.3×+0.1×

Profitability

Gross margin77.8%-0.3pp

Operating margin9.7%+0.9pp

Net margin4.7%-1.0pp

FCF margin7.3%+4.0pp

Returns & leverage

Return on equity219.8%—

Debt / equity10.4×—

Current ratio1.2×+0.3×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Herbalife in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept hlf:CumulativeRealignmentCostIncurred.

The official record: Herbalife’s 10-Q, filed May 6, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Herbalife's retention and separation — cumulative realignment cost incurred.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI

Harbor at dusk

Questions, answered.

What is Herbalife's retention and separation — cumulative realignment cost incurred?: Herbalife (HLF) reported retention and separation — cumulative realignment cost incurred of $11.5M in Q1 2026.
What does retention and separation — cumulative realignment cost incurred mean?: Represents the aggregate costs incurred over time for realignment programs within the retention and separation segment. This metric allows investors to evaluate the total financial commitment made toward strategic operational shifts. It is useful for benchmarking the scale of realignment efforts against expected long-term operational gains.