International Business Machines IBM Ratios & Valuation
| Q1 '26 | Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | ||||||
| Gross margin | 58.4%+0.2pp | 58.2%+0.4pp | 57.8%+0.2pp | 57.6%+0.5pp | 57%+0.4pp | |
| Net margin | 15.6%-0.1pp | 15.7%+3.6pp | 12.1%+3.0pp | 9.1%+0.4pp | 8.7%-0.9pp | |
| Returns | ||||||
| Return on equity | 35.9%+0.6pp | 35.3%+5.1pp | 30.2%+7.6pp | 22.6%+0.8pp | 21.8%-2.3pp | |
| Return on invested capital | 13.2%-1.3pp | 14.5%+0.8pp | 13.7%+3.9pp | 9.8%+0.6pp | 9.2%-0.6pp | |
| Efficiency | ||||||
| Asset turnover | 0.5×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.5×0.0× | 0.4×0.0× | |
| Liquidity | ||||||
| Current ratio | 0.8×-0.2× | 1×0.0× | 0.9×0.0× | 0.9×-0.1× | 1×0.0× | |
| Leverage | ||||||
| Debt-to-equity | 2.3×+0.1× | 2.2×-0.5× | 2.7×-0.1× | 2.8×0.0× | 2.7×+0.4× | |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.8×+0.4× | 3.4×-0.5× | 3.9×-1.1× | 5×-0.1× | 5.1×+0.9× | |
| Per Share | ||||||
| Book value per share | $34.63+0.6% | $34.41+17.0% | $29.41+1.3% | $29.02+2.1% | $28.43-2.4% | |
| Valuation | ||||||
| Market capitalization | $227.46B-17.8% | $276.88B+5.3% | $262.84B-3.7% | $273.05B+18.4% | $230.57B+13.4% | |
| Price / earnings | 21.2×-5.0× | 26.1×-7.1× | 33.2×-13.6× | 46.8×+4.7× | 42.1×+8.4× | |
| Price / sales | 3.3×-0.8× | 4.1×+0.1× | 4×-0.2× | 4.3×+0.6× | 3.7×+0.4× | |
| Price / book | 6.9×-1.6× | 8.5×-0.9× | 9.4×-0.5× | 9.9×+1.3× | 8.6×+1.1× | |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.7×-2.7× | 19.4×-0.7× | 20.1×-6.1× | 26.2×+2.4× | 23.8×+3.0× | |
| Dividend yield | 2.8%+0.5pp | 2.3%-0.1pp | 2.4%+0.1pp | 2.3%-0.4pp | 2.7%-0.3pp |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- Where do International Business Machines's ratios come from?
- Every ratio is computed from International Business Machines's SEC filings — trailing-twelve-month flows over period-end balances. Valuation multiples combine those fundamentals with market data, recomputed each period. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any ratio for its full history and peer comparisons.
