Gladstone Land LAND Business Segments
| FY'25 | FY'24 | FY'23 | FY'22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acre-feet of Water Assets by Geography | |||||
| Arizona | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Colorado | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Delaware | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Florida | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Fresno, CA | 28.5K+33.8% | 21.3K— | —— | —— | |
| Georgia | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Kern, CA | 193.2K+1.2% | 190.9K+40.4% | 136K— | —— | |
| Maryland | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Michigan | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Nebraska | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| New Jersey | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Oregon | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| South Carolina | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Texas | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Washington | 0— | 0— | 0— | —— | |
| Net Cost Basis by Geography | |||||
| Arizona | $195.27M-3.8% | $202.89M-4.2% | $211.89M-3.9% | $220.59M-2.0% | |
| Colorado | $174.28M-4.7% | $182.85M-0.9% | $184.49M-1.4% | $187.05M-1.9% | |
| Delaware | $5.09M-1.1% | $5.15M-1.2% | $5.21M+0.3% | $5.2M+1.8% | |
| Florida | $483.91M-27.4% | $666.44M-24.8% | $885.86M-1.0% | $894.62M+4.7% | |
| Georgia | $9.16M-4.8% | $9.62M-7.0% | $10.35M-7.4% | $11.17M— | |
| Maryland | $31.55M-1.2% | $31.93M-0.9% | $32.22M-0.1% | $32.27M+1.2% | |
| Michigan | $59.5M-26.5% | $80.94M-13.5% | $93.53M-3.3% | $96.72M+12.2% | |
| Nebraska | $79.09M-34.4% | $120.58M-1.4% | $122.24M-0.4% | $122.76M+0.6% | |
| New Jersey | $8.15M-1.4% | $8.27M-1.9% | $8.43M-1.8% | $8.58M— | |
| Oregon | $116.79M0.0% | $116.74M-1.8% | $118.93M+17.6% | $101.14M+98.1% | |
| South Carolina | $13.58M-2.6% | $13.94M-2.5% | $14.3M-2.5% | $14.66M-2.4% | |
| Texas | $36.68M+13.8% | $32.22M-0.9% | $32.52M-0.9% | $32.81M-0.9% | |
| Washington | $213M-7.4% | $230.04M-7.0% | $247.48M+21.0% | $204.59M+33.6% | |
| Total Acres by Geography | |||||
| Arizona | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K0.0% | $25.28K+0.3% | $25.2K+0.3% | |
| Colorado | $129.77K-1.0% | $131.09K0.0% | $131.09K0.0% | $131.09K0.0% | |
| Delaware | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | $7200.0% | |
| Florida | $47K-21.5% | $59.91K-11.5% | $67.68K-25.1% | $90.41K+5.7% | |
| Georgia | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $9200.0% | $920— | |
| Maryland | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | $3.95K0.0% | |
| Michigan | $4.98K-28.0% | $6.92K-8.5% | $7.57K0.0% | $7.57K+14.0% | |
| Nebraska | $20.89K-32.9% | $31.13K0.0% | $31.13K0.0% | $31.13K0.0% | |
| New Jersey | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $4640.0% | $464— | |
| Oregon | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K0.0% | $3.59K+10.6% | $3.25K+53.0% | |
| South Carolina | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | $2.39K0.0% | |
| Texas | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | $14.67K0.0% | |
| Washington | $10.08K0.0% | $10.08K-0.3% | $10.11K+29.1% | $7.83K+41.4% | |
| Farm acres by Geography | |||||
| Kern, CA | 9.6K— | —— | —— | —— |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does Gladstone Land break its business down?
- Gladstone Land (LAND) reports acre-feet of water assets by geography across 15 parts — Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Florida and Fresno, CA. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does Gladstone Land's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in Gladstone Land's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
