Peapack-Gladstone Financial PGC Impaired Financing Receivable with No Related Allowance - Unpaid Principal Balance
Impaired Financing Receivable with No Related Allowance - Unpaid Principal Balance at other companies
Other financials
Where this comes from
Reported directly by Peapack-Gladstone Financial in its filing.
Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:FinancingReceivableNonaccrualNoAllowance.
The official record: Peapack-Gladstone Financial’s 10-Q, filed May 8, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →
Ask your AI about Peapack-Gladstone Financial's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance.
Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.
Connect your AI
Claude
Questions, answered.
- What is Peapack-Gladstone Financial's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance?
- Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) reported impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance of $36.08M in Q1 2026.
- How has Peapack-Gladstone Financial's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance changed year-over-year?
- Peapack-Gladstone Financial's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance decreased by 10.3% year-over-year, from $40.24M to $36.08M.
- What is the long-term trend for Peapack-Gladstone Financial's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance?
- Over 5 years (2020 to 2025), Peapack-Gladstone Financial's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance has grown at a 20.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $14.15M to $35.97M.
- What does impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance mean?
- This metric represents the unpaid principal balance of loans that have been identified as impaired but do not require a specific allowance for credit losses. This occurs when the collateral value or other recovery sources are deemed sufficient to cover the expected loss. It provides insight into the bank's assessment of collateral quality and risk mitigation strategies for troubled assets.