Bank of the James Financial Group BOTJ Impaired Financing Receivable with No Related Allowance - Unpaid Principal Balance
Impaired Financing Receivable with No Related Allowance - Unpaid Principal Balance at other companies
Other financials
Where this comes from
Reported directly by Bank of the James Financial Group in its filing.
Tagged under the XBRL concept us-gaap:FinancingReceivableNonaccrualNoAllowance.
The official record: Bank of the James Financial Group’s 10-Q, filed May 12, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →
Ask your AI about Bank of the James Financial Group's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance.
Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.
Connect your AI
Claude
Questions, answered.
- What is Bank of the James Financial Group's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance?
- Bank of the James Financial Group (BOTJ) reported impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance of $1.38M in Q1 2026.
- How has Bank of the James Financial Group's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance changed year-over-year?
- Bank of the James Financial Group's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance decreased by 20.2% year-over-year, from $1.73M to $1.38M.
- What is the long-term trend for Bank of the James Financial Group's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance?
- Over 2 years (2023 to 2025), Bank of the James Financial Group's impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance has grown at a 104.3% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), from $391K to $1.63M.
- What does impaired financing receivable with no related allowance - unpaid principal balance mean?
- This represents the unpaid principal balance of loans that have been identified as impaired but for which the bank has determined that no specific allowance for credit loss is required. This often occurs when the fair value of the underlying collateral is sufficient to cover the outstanding balance, mitigating the need for additional reserves.