Skip to content

Citizens CIA Compensation limitation under 162(m) and 280 (g), Percent

Compensation limitation under 162(m) and 280 (g), Percent at other companies

Veeva Systems logo
Veeva SystemsVEEV
1.2%
Veeva Systems logo
Veeva SystemsVEEV
$3.63M
Playtika Holding Corp. logo
Playtika Holding Corp.PLTK
$1.13M+32.4%
UFP Technologies logo
UFP TechnologiesUFPT
$421.25K-13.9%
Playtika Holding Corp. logo
Playtika Holding Corp.PLTK
-2.6%-3.8pp
The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. logo
The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.BWIN
$38.75K-84.3%

Other financials

Income statement

See full
Revenue$59.7M+7.3%
Net income$2.3M+240%
EPS (diluted)$0.04+233%

Balance sheet

See full
Cash & equivalents$18.5M+0.9%
Total debt$7.4M-5.5%
Total equity$238.7M+9.4%
Total assets$1.7B+2.2%

Cash flow

See full
Operating cash flow-$323.0K-143%
CapEx$326.0K+205%
Free cash flow-$649.0K-201%

Valuation

See full
Market cap$300.79M+65.2%
P/E16.3×-4.5×
P/S1.2×+0.4×

Profitability

See full
Net margin7.1%+3.5pp
FCF margin6.3%-4.1pp

Returns & leverage

See full
Return on equity8.1%+3.9pp
Debt / equity0.0×

Where this comes from

Reported directly by Citizens in its filing.

Tagged under the XBRL concept cia:FederalIncomeTaxRateReconciliation162mCompensationLimitationPercent.

The official record: Citizens’s 10-K, filed March 12, 2026, on SEC EDGAR. View the filing →

Ask your AI about Citizens's compensation limitation under 162(m) and 280 (g), percent.

Connect your AI assistant and compare it to peers, right in your chat.

Connect your AI
Harbor at dusk
Claude

Questions, answered.

What is Citizens's compensation limitation under 162(m) and 280 (g), percent?
Citizens (CIA) reported compensation limitation under 162(m) and 280 (g), percent of 0.4% in Q4 2025.
What does compensation limitation under 162(m) and 280 (g), percent mean?
This measures the percentage of total executive compensation that is disallowed as a tax deduction due to regulatory caps. It provides a normalized view of how much of the company's compensation expense is effectively penalized by tax laws. Investors use this to evaluate the alignment between executive compensation structures and tax-efficient financial management.