EastGroup Properties EGP Business Segments
| Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '25 | Q4 '24 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate, Gross by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $92.77M— | —— | —— | —— | $93.93M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $133.42M— | —— | —— | —— | $133.29M— | |
| COLORADO | $66.31M— | —— | —— | —— | $47.37M— | |
| FLORIDA | $42.51M— | —— | —— | —— | $42.37M— | |
| GEORGIA | $86.25M— | —— | —— | —— | $86.24M— | |
| LOUISIANA | $33.2M— | —— | —— | —— | $32.8M— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $11.9M— | —— | —— | —— | $11.92M— | |
| NEVADA | $52.35M— | —— | —— | —— | $52.35M— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $49.97M— | —— | —— | —— | $49.94M— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $24.99M— | —— | —— | —— | $24.98M— | |
| TENNESSEE | $32.33M— | —— | —— | —— | $30.28M— | |
| TEXAS | $98.41M— | —— | —— | —— | $98.26M— | |
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, Land, Amount by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $9.79M— | —— | —— | —— | $9.79M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $31.82M— | —— | —— | —— | $31.82M— | |
| COLORADO | $6.14M— | —— | —— | —— | $6.14M— | |
| FLORIDA | $32.48M— | —— | —— | —— | $9.09M— | |
| GEORGIA | $7.04M— | —— | —— | —— | $7.04M— | |
| LOUISIANA | $2.86M— | —— | —— | —— | $2.86M— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $17K— | —— | —— | —— | $17K— | |
| NEVADA | $20.09M— | —— | —— | —— | $20.09M— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $9.4M— | —— | —— | —— | $9.4M— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $1.34M— | —— | —— | —— | $1.34M— | |
| TENNESSEE | $5.35M— | —— | —— | —— | $10.46M— | |
| TEXAS | $30.77M— | —— | —— | —— | $30.77M— | |
| Right of use assets - Ground leases (operating) by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $9.75M— | —— | —— | —— | $11.02M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| COLORADO | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| FLORIDA | $2.41M— | —— | —— | —— | $2.6M— | |
| GEORGIA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| LOUISIANA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| NEVADA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| TENNESSEE | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| TEXAS | $9.79M— | —— | —— | —— | $10.69M— | |
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, Initial Cost of Land by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $9.79M— | —— | —— | —— | $9.79M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $31.82M— | —— | —— | —— | $31.82M— | |
| COLORADO | $6.14M— | —— | —— | —— | $6.14M— | |
| FLORIDA | $32.43M— | —— | —— | —— | $9.09M— | |
| GEORGIA | $7.04M— | —— | —— | —— | $7.04M— | |
| LOUISIANA | $2.86M— | —— | —— | —— | $2.86M— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| NEVADA | $20.09M— | —— | —— | —— | $20.09M— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $9.4M— | —— | —— | —— | $9.4M— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $1.34M— | —— | —— | —— | $1.34M— | |
| TENNESSEE | $5.34M— | —— | —— | —— | $10.46M— | |
| TEXAS | $30.78M— | —— | —— | —— | $30.78M— | |
| Accumulated Depreciation by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $12.23M— | —— | —— | —— | $11.47M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $16.74M— | —— | —— | —— | $15.63M— | |
| COLORADO | $8.52M— | —— | —— | —— | $7.29M— | |
| FLORIDA | $18.82M— | —— | —— | —— | $17.89M— | |
| GEORGIA | $5.74M— | —— | —— | —— | $5.16M— | |
| LOUISIANA | $22.36M— | —— | —— | —— | $21.27M— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $7.54M— | —— | —— | —— | $7.23M— | |
| NEVADA | $8.11M— | —— | —— | —— | $7.2M— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $14.73M— | —— | —— | —— | $13.97M— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $2.92M— | —— | —— | —— | $2.47M— | |
| TENNESSEE | $2.42M— | —— | —— | —— | $1.19M— | |
| TEXAS | $28.26M— | —— | —— | —— | $26.85M— | |
| Buildings and Improvements by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $83.02M— | —— | —— | —— | $82.91M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $101.6M— | —— | —— | —— | $101.47M— | |
| COLORADO | $60.43M— | —— | —— | —— | $41.24M— | |
| FLORIDA | $37.61M— | —— | —— | —— | $37.47M— | |
| GEORGIA | $79.22M— | —— | —— | —— | $79.21M— | |
| LOUISIANA | $30.64M— | —— | —— | —— | $30.24M— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $11.88M— | —— | —— | —— | $11.9M— | |
| NEVADA | $33.5M— | —— | —— | —— | $33.5M— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $40.57M— | —— | —— | —— | $40.54M— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $23.65M— | —— | —— | —— | $23.65M— | |
| TENNESSEE | $29.86M— | —— | —— | —— | $27.81M— | |
| TEXAS | $88.93M— | —— | —— | —— | $88.1M— | |
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, Initial Cost of Building and Improvements by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $82.91M— | —— | —— | —— | $82.91M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $100.86M— | —— | —— | —— | $100.86M— | |
| COLORADO | $39.64M— | —— | —— | —— | $39.64M— | |
| FLORIDA | $27.5M— | —— | —— | —— | $27.5M— | |
| GEORGIA | $79.21M— | —— | —— | —— | $79.21M— | |
| LOUISIANA | $17.62M— | —— | —— | —— | $17.62M— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $9.96M— | —— | —— | —— | $9.96M— | |
| NEVADA | $33.21M— | —— | —— | —— | $33.21M— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $40.53M— | —— | —— | —— | $40.53M— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $19.43M— | —— | —— | —— | $19.43M— | |
| TENNESSEE | $27.81M— | —— | —— | —— | $27.81M— | |
| TEXAS | $86.56M— | —— | —— | —— | $86.56M— | |
| Year Acquired by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | |
| CALIFORNIA | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| COLORADO | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | |
| FLORIDA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.3+0.1% | 505.80.0% | |
| GEORGIA | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | |
| LOUISIANA | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | |
| NEVADA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | |
| TENNESSEE | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | |
| TEXAS | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% | |
| Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $29.86M— | —— | —— | —— | $24.18M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $57.13M— | —— | —— | —— | $57.15M— | |
| COLORADO | $60.43M— | —— | —— | —— | $38.92M— | |
| FLORIDA | $37.61M— | —— | —— | —— | $37.47M— | |
| GEORGIA | $32.17M— | —— | —— | —— | $29.68M— | |
| LOUISIANA | $13.02M— | —— | —— | —— | $12.62M— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $1.94M— | —— | —— | —— | $1.96M— | |
| NEVADA | $4.65M— | —— | —— | —— | $4.56M— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $32.14M— | —— | —— | —— | $27.95M— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $12.75M— | —— | —— | —— | $12.69M— | |
| TENNESSEE | $3.55M— | —— | —— | —— | $124K— | |
| TEXAS | $44.35M— | —— | —— | —— | $41.75M— | |
| Year Constructed by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| CALIFORNIA | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| COLORADO | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.3+0.5% | 503.50.0% | |
| FLORIDA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% | |
| GEORGIA | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | |
| LOUISIANA | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | |
| NEVADA | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.3+0.1% | 505.80.0% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.3+0.1% | 505.80.0% | |
| TENNESSEE | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| TEXAS | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does EastGroup Properties break its business down?
- EastGroup Properties (EGP) reports sec schedule, 12-28, real estate companies, investment in real estate, gross by geography across 12 parts — ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, FLORIDA and GEORGIA. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does EastGroup Properties's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in EastGroup Properties's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
