EastGroup Properties EGP Business Segments
| Q4 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q1 '25 | Q4 '24 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate, Gross by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $92.77M-1.2% | —— | —— | —— | $93.93M+216% | |
| CALIFORNIA | $133.42M+0.1% | —— | —— | —— | $133.29M0.0% | |
| COLORADO | $66.31M+40.0% | —— | —— | —— | $47.37M0.0% | |
| FLORIDA | $42.51M+0.3% | —— | —— | —— | $42.37M+4.7% | |
| GEORGIA | $86.25M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $86.24M+213% | |
| LOUISIANA | $33.2M+1.2% | —— | —— | —— | $32.8M+1.1% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $11.9M-0.2% | —— | —— | —— | $11.92M0.0% | |
| NEVADA | $52.35M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $52.35M+2.2% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $49.97M+0.1% | —— | —— | —— | $49.94M+86.8% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $24.99M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $24.98M+2.6% | |
| TENNESSEE | $32.33M+6.8% | —— | —— | —— | $30.28M0.0% | |
| TEXAS | $98.41M+0.1% | —— | —— | —— | $98.26M-0.2% | |
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, Land, Amount by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $9.79M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $9.79M-46.5% | |
| CALIFORNIA | $31.82M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $31.82M0.0% | |
| COLORADO | $6.14M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $6.14M0.0% | |
| FLORIDA | $32.48M+257% | —— | —— | —— | $9.09M-40.0% | |
| GEORGIA | $7.04M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $7.04M+21.6% | |
| LOUISIANA | $2.86M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $2.86M0.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $17K0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $17K-95.0% | |
| NEVADA | $20.09M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $20.09M0.0% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $9.4M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $9.4M+13.3% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $1.34M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $1.34M0.0% | |
| TENNESSEE | $5.35M-48.9% | —— | —— | —— | $10.46M+325% | |
| TEXAS | $30.77M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $30.77M0.0% | |
| Right of use assets - Ground leases (operating) by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $9.75M-11.6% | —— | —— | —— | $11.02M— | |
| CALIFORNIA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| COLORADO | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| FLORIDA | $2.41M-7.1% | —— | —— | —— | $2.6M-7.1% | |
| GEORGIA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| LOUISIANA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| NEVADA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| TENNESSEE | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0— | |
| TEXAS | $9.79M-8.4% | —— | —— | —— | $10.69M-1.8% | |
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, Initial Cost of Land by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $9.79M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $9.79M-46.5% | |
| CALIFORNIA | $31.82M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $31.82M0.0% | |
| COLORADO | $6.14M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $6.14M0.0% | |
| FLORIDA | $32.43M+257% | —— | —— | —— | $9.09M-40.0% | |
| GEORGIA | $7.04M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $7.04M+21.6% | |
| LOUISIANA | $2.86M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $2.86M0.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $0— | —— | —— | —— | $0-100% | |
| NEVADA | $20.09M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $20.09M0.0% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $9.4M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $9.4M+13.3% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $1.34M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $1.34M0.0% | |
| TENNESSEE | $5.34M-48.9% | —— | —— | —— | $10.46M+325% | |
| TEXAS | $30.78M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $30.78M0.0% | |
| Accumulated Depreciation by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $12.23M+6.6% | —— | —— | —— | $11.47M+6.7% | |
| CALIFORNIA | $16.74M+7.1% | —— | —— | —— | $15.63M+5.5% | |
| COLORADO | $8.52M+16.9% | —— | —— | —— | $7.29M+21.2% | |
| FLORIDA | $18.82M+5.2% | —— | —— | —— | $17.89M+5.7% | |
| GEORGIA | $5.74M+11.2% | —— | —— | —— | $5.16M+8.1% | |
| LOUISIANA | $22.36M+5.1% | —— | —— | —— | $21.27M+5.3% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $7.54M+4.2% | —— | —— | —— | $7.23M-12.2% | |
| NEVADA | $8.11M+12.6% | —— | —— | —— | $7.2M+12.5% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $14.73M+5.4% | —— | —— | —— | $13.97M+5.2% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $2.92M+18.0% | —— | —— | —— | $2.47M+21.9% | |
| TENNESSEE | $2.42M+103% | —— | —— | —— | $1.19M+601% | |
| TEXAS | $28.26M+5.3% | —— | —— | —— | $26.85M+5.2% | |
| Buildings and Improvements by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $83.02M+0.1% | —— | —— | —— | $82.91M+247% | |
| CALIFORNIA | $101.6M+0.1% | —— | —— | —— | $101.47M0.0% | |
| COLORADO | $60.43M+46.6% | —— | —— | —— | $41.24M0.0% | |
| FLORIDA | $37.61M+0.4% | —— | —— | —— | $37.47M+5.4% | |
| GEORGIA | $79.22M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $79.21M+221% | |
| LOUISIANA | $30.64M+1.3% | —— | —— | —— | $30.24M+1.2% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $11.88M-0.2% | —— | —— | —— | $11.9M0.0% | |
| NEVADA | $33.5M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $33.5M+7.6% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $40.57M+0.1% | —— | —— | —— | $40.54M+63.5% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $23.65M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $23.65M+2.8% | |
| TENNESSEE | $29.86M+7.4% | —— | —— | —— | $27.81M0.0% | |
| TEXAS | $88.93M+0.9% | —— | —— | —— | $88.1M+0.6% | |
| SEC Schedule, 12-28, Real Estate Companies, Investment in Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, Initial Cost of Building and Improvements by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $82.91M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $82.91M+460% | |
| CALIFORNIA | $100.86M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $100.86M0.0% | |
| COLORADO | $39.64M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $39.64M0.0% | |
| FLORIDA | $27.5M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $27.5M0.0% | |
| GEORGIA | $79.21M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $79.21M+457% | |
| LOUISIANA | $17.62M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $17.62M0.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $9.96M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $9.96M0.0% | |
| NEVADA | $33.21M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $33.21M+6.7% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $40.53M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $40.53M+151% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $19.43M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $19.43M0.0% | |
| TENNESSEE | $27.81M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $27.81M0.0% | |
| TEXAS | $86.56M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $86.56M0.0% | |
| Year Acquired by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 506+0.1% | |
| CALIFORNIA | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| COLORADO | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | |
| FLORIDA | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 505.80.0% | |
| GEORGIA | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 506+0.1% | |
| LOUISIANA | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | 499.30.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | 500.30.0% | |
| NEVADA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506+0.1% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | |
| TENNESSEE | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | |
| TEXAS | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% | |
| Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | $29.86M+23.5% | —— | —— | —— | $24.18M+1.3% | |
| CALIFORNIA | $57.13M0.0% | —— | —— | —— | $57.15M0.0% | |
| COLORADO | $60.43M+55.3% | —— | —— | —— | $38.92M+338% | |
| FLORIDA | $37.61M+0.4% | —— | —— | —— | $37.47M+5.4% | |
| GEORGIA | $32.17M+8.4% | —— | —— | —— | $29.68M+20.3% | |
| LOUISIANA | $13.02M+3.2% | —— | —— | —— | $12.62M+2.9% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | $1.94M-1.1% | —— | —— | —— | $1.96M-66.5% | |
| NEVADA | $4.65M+2.0% | —— | —— | —— | $4.56M+8.3% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | $32.14M+15.0% | —— | —— | —— | $27.95M+12.7% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | $12.75M+0.5% | —— | —— | —— | $12.69M+11.3% | |
| TENNESSEE | $3.55M+2,765% | —— | —— | —— | $124K— | |
| TEXAS | $44.35M+6.2% | —— | —— | —— | $41.75M+29.8% | |
| Year Constructed by Geography | ||||||
| ARIZONA | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| CALIFORNIA | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| COLORADO | 506.3+0.5% | 506.3+0.5% | 506.3+0.5% | 506.3+0.5% | 503.50.0% | |
| FLORIDA | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% | |
| GEORGIA | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | 5060.0% | |
| LOUISIANA | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | 4960.0% | |
| MISSISSIPPI | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | 500.50.0% | |
| NEVADA | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | 505.80.0% | |
| NORTH CAROLINA | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 505.80.0% | |
| SOUTH CAROLINA | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 506.3+0.1% | 505.80.0% | |
| TENNESSEE | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | 505.50.0% | |
| TEXAS | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 506.30.0% | 5060.0% |
Chart any of these lines over time, or line them up against competitors.
Compare these in charts →Questions, answered.
- How does EastGroup Properties break its business down?
- EastGroup Properties (EGP) reports sec schedule, 12-28, real estate companies, investment in real estate, gross by geography across 12 parts — ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, FLORIDA and GEORGIA. Each is extracted from the segment footnotes and tracked over time.
- Where does EastGroup Properties's segment data come from?
- Segment breakdowns are pulled from the segment footnotes in EastGroup Properties's SEC filings (the XBRL dimensional tags), so every line ties back to a reported figure. Switch between quarterly, annual, and TTM, or open any segment for its full history.
